this post was submitted on 27 May 2026
1295 points (99.4% liked)

Uplifting News

19006 readers
175 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 156 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The power to create and limit corporations has been the exclusive power of States for 200 years and upheld multiple times in SCOTUS.

Lets fuckin GO!

[–] GardenGeek@europe.pub 65 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Devils advocate:

You're also sure it will be upheld under this SCOTUS?

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (2 children)

SCOTUS will not have time for this before the midterms. So still a win for now.

[–] leftascenter@jlai.lu 32 points 2 days ago

Latest last week tonight is An eye opener on what they can really do when pressed by time and don't give a fuck.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

The "Shadow docket" says hi.

In this instance it isn't law yet so I doubt there will be a rush to get to the SCOTUS yet, but the shadow docket is their favorite go-to with this administration to rush through whatever ruling they deem ~~will help Republicans~~ important.

Ugh unfortunately a valid point.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Obviously not but wtf are they gonna do about it? They can't reign in a senile clown. As if they're gonna do anything California or New York gives a fuck about at this point.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What are they going to do?

"Corporations are people as per already established rulings."

"Political contributions are considered speech as per already established rulings."

"Hawaii is taking away poor poor corporations right to free speech under the first amendment, therefore it's unconstitutional and will be made null and void. Have fun shoveling money at your chosen candidates corporations! Don't forget my paycheck!"

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca -5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Not sure what the downvotes are for unless they just don't like having a video as a response.

I'm a bit confused on the language because he says the state the corporation was created in give them their rights, so wouldn't any corporation not from that state be able to spend anyway?

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 9 points 2 days ago

I didn't down vote, but I really would prefer text

My thinking is that any major corporation isn’t willing to give up business in an entire state but that’s a great question and if someone has a more definitive answer I’d love to hear it.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

so wouldn't any corporation not from that state be able to spend anyway?

I believe you are correct. This is why as many states as possible need to follow suit.