this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
295 points (95.1% liked)
me_irl
7779 readers
3600 users here now
All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It seems to be consensus amongst pretty much every man I meet under 30 that we are completely finished with approaching women / asking them on dates or even really just signaling attraction at all.
Balls in your court women! Be brave cause we won't
Don't be weird, it goes both ways and requires effort from both parties.
I'm not being weird, I'm just keeping it real man. I wish it were egalitarian they way you suggest but that truly does not seem to be the case to me or anybody I know who is my age or younger.
A thing younger guys always struggle with
Except that when a man puts in effort, he's suddenly labeled a misogynistic creep...
What does this 'effort' look like if it's making you seem creepy? If everywhere you go makes you feel like a creep, maybe that's what you are.
Plenty of others' experiences prove this statement to be false.
Don't heed the 'us vs them' rhetoric—it will only harm yourself. Do your thing, living your life, and put in the effort required when opportunity presents itself.
And don't be a creep—it's not hard.
If you want tips or feedback, just ask.
Conversely, plenty of others' experience prove it to be true. That's the thing about overgeneralizing experience. You end up ignoring the margins.
I'm not the one falling for "us vs. them," but I've certainly had that rhetoric weaponized against me enough to know what's happening.
The whole "man vs. bear" discussion is "us vs. them" rhetoric, but for some reason everyone wants to pretend they have amnesia when someone says women tend to treat men as if they're dangerous by default.
It's kinda hard to just "not be a creep" when anyone who sees me for the first time is just going to leap to the assumption that I'm a danger to them. Like, okay, let me just vacate the area for your comfort. I didn't actually need groceries, right? Why would that be the reason I'm at the grocery store?
Face it dude, society makes biased assumptions about men. Maybe you have attractiveness privilege or coolness privilege or accepted-by-your-peers privilege, but when you have no friends or social skills to speak of then the world treats you different. And just because you've never experienced that doesn't mean other people don't struggle with it.
...No? You made an absolute statement, which is verifiably false.
Also love the assumptions you're making about me lmao
As a man, it's this simple: Either you are the exception to the rule and it doesn't apply to you, or you need to do some serious introspection. Pick one.
I, personally, am not a danger to women.
What say you?
I said men have experienced this pattern. That's not an absolute statement, but you claiming that it never happens is.
I'm not making assumptions, you revealed it yourself.
I'm not a danger to women either, but that doesn't stop women from thinking I might be. The whole point of the man vs. bear thing is that women can't exactly know whether man is dangerous just by looking at him. That's true, but I disagree with the apparent conclusion that people tend to draw from it, which is to assume every man is dangerous by default. In what other situation is it ever okay to make sweeping, prejudicial assumptions about an entire category of people based on an overgeneralization?
If you don't think that's a thing that happens, then apparently you didn't pay much attention to the discourse, so I wonder how much actual introspection and listening to women you even do...
I was saying this absolute statement is false:
This is not your comment and that's on me—i apologize (i subconsciously ignore usernames).
Please quote me where I said it never happens, btw
You make the assunption that I'm extraordinarily attractive, cool, or accepted-by-my-peers, which is hilariously untrue.
You're asking me when is it ever acceptable to take caution as the vulnerable party? Surely you're joking.
Also, cops. lol ACAB
Billionaires too
I pay a lot of attention to the discourse, it just doesn't affect me because I'm not a creep.
Lots of men, ugly and uncool included, are still befriending and dating women (even the creeps). You are free to approach the situation however you want.
But don't listen to me—woe is you, i guess.
Are you speaking from experience? How many times did this happen to you?
You're not worth engaging with 🙄
Given the amount of weddings I’m attending this summer, it feels like your falling for a selection bias.
Hmmm
My selection is much more broad — the type of acquaintance or relationship is wildly more diverse than “sadsack incels I talk to on Discord.”
Going to assume you're just making a general comparison here rather than making wild assumptions specific to OP.
Don't see how that relates to my point at all
I’d recommend working on the logical progression of mundane thoughts as maybe an area of growth for you, then.
No
Even dating apps and matrimony profiles (I'm Indian) aren't helpful.
Although I had mentioned I want childfree/DINK lifestyle on matrimony apps so that may have been a factor in me being unsuccessful there.
We are supposed to signal attraction?
I'm still waiting for my future wife to break into my house and tell me we are now dating.
A signed form clearly stating your intentions.
Anything less leaves the man liable for allegations later, so yeah...
Men signaling attraction get accused of objectification.
But when they don't signal attraction they get called passive and told they need more confidence...
You're telling on yourself, man. This is a skill issue.
You again? You're right, I have no social skills. Stop trying to turn that into a moral failing.
I see you complaining about your lack of social skills. The thing about skills is they are learned, developed, practiced, and maintained. You not working on developing your social skills isn't the fault of women.
The thing about that is that the very foundation of social skills are learned during the formative years of cognitive development. There are enough long-term psychological studies on the disastrous effects of childhood isolation on one's long-term capacity to socialize and integrate later in life.
I was isolated growing up. Homeschooled, I didn't get to interact with my peers and develop social skills. By the time I started going to public school, it was already too late. People could sense that I was "weird," so I was bullied and ostracized. That doesn't help one learn to socialize, especially when one is already several years behind one's peers in terms of social development.
I spent years, decades even, trying to "catch up" on my social skills, but it's not that simple. Social scripts that just don't come intuitively to me. I've read books on social skills, I've been in therapy, but trying to learn these things as "techniques" is nowhere near the same as developing them naturally, and people can sense that. As a consequence, I've never really been able to interact with people consistently enough to even practice social skills enough to become natural.
I never said it's "the fault of women" as you suggest. I'm really tired of that worn-out strawman. But does it have to be "the fault of women" (as some general, abstract category; again, as you suggest), in order for me to say "Hey, maybe it would be alright if people treated me with the same basic dignity and respect as everyone else, even though I don't seem normal and don't have very good social skills."
But no, it's always degradation, derision, exaggerations, and accusations, exactly like what's going on in this thread here. You really think I'm not used to that by now?
Yes, me again. I saw both your comments and said something to both. I can do that.
I never suggested it was a moral failing. I'm implying you shouldn't use your own awkwardness as evidence that women are incapable of being approached by any man without them finding something gross about them. That's simply untrue. I'm telling you this as someone with serious social anxiety that led to a prominent incel phase. It's just a skill issue. I lack em too.
You probably see a moral failing there because it is misogynistic to assume women will accuse a man of being misogynistic or objectifying just for approaching them. Some might, but I'd chalk that up to them being wary more than anything. Even if they do, prove em wrong.
Btw you don't have to engage with me over this. I can do without it. But I think the world's a little better when we humanize each other, and I bet you agree.
I'm not doing that. That's literally what the whole "man vs. bear" thing was about. Did you miss that whole discussion, or are we just pretending that didn't happen now?
No it's not, that's just basic pattern recognition and learning from experience. If women consistently make it clear that they don't want to be approached by men, how is there any other option available to a man other than to conclude that women don't want to be approached by men?
It seems anyone who hasn't reached this conclusion couldn't really be listening to the voices of women.
That's literally not an option. Once one says "no," then the only option is to walk away. There isn't a "prove them wrong" phase. This isn't a romcom from the early 2000s...
Yeah, I do agree with that. But I'm tired of being dehumanized, and I'm tired of being called a misogynist every time I mention how tired I am of being dehumanized.
Don't worry, they'll blame you for that too.
I don't really feel like blaming anyone. It's just how it is.