this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
76 points (98.7% liked)

Ukraine

12530 readers
576 users here now

News related to Ukraine

Matrix Space


Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷[Combat] videos containing footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW

No AI slop

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³ Defense Aid πŸ’₯


πŸ’³ Humanitarian Aid βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ


πŸͺ– Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


See also:

!nafo@lemm.ee

!combatvideos@SJW


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I thought autonomous killbots were still not used (officially,) outside like Israel. There is some agreement not to go full autonomous, not sure the signatories. Anyone have any confirmation on this?

[–] testaccount372920@piefed.zip 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They're saying two different things in the post. One is that a drone is flown to a location and then automatically attacks whatever it encounters, that's fully automatic and would be aweful imo because then the drone is making decisions on what to attack/kill.

The second thing is later in the post when they talk about countermeasures. They state that the drones can be countered before they're locked on to a target. That implies that an operator picks a target and the automation part only serves to keep the drone locked on the target, but the drone makes no decision on what to target. That's conceptually similar to a pilot selection an enemy aircraft they locked onto before firing a missile.

From the post it's not quit clear which of the two are the case or if both are happening. I suspect it's the second case because Ukraine can't really afford the bad publicity of the first case imo.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

It's true, locking onto a target is no different than a guided missile. The Russian blogger is trying to make it sound like it's autonomous killbots, when it's guided munitions that are set on a target, by people, to avoid jamming.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's probably not true that they're using AI for this.

[–] esc@piefed.social 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Local onboard 'AI' is used for image recognition, classification and target locking usually, and it flies using essentially agrodrone software missions (ardupilot). It's not completely autonomous, just mostly hands off.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

It does sound like someone clicks the right blob onscreen, so in the absence of further instruction, the drone will go give it a hug. That's missile lock-on via webcam, not a flying landmine.