At first I thought they meant literal hornets and thought this was the total mental breakdown of a Russian soldier.
this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
76 points (98.7% liked)
Ukraine
12530 readers
586 users here now
News related to Ukraine
Community Rules
πΊπ¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
π»π€’No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
π₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
π·[Combat] videos containing footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW
No AI slop
β Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
π³ Defense Aid π₯
π³ Humanitarian Aid βοΈβοΈ
πͺ Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
See also:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
NOT THE BEEEEEEES
Half-Life 2 vibes.
Not sure how real this post is, but if not its only a matter of time before un-jammable independent drones are doing shit like this all over the place.
but smoke can help
Future headline: Hornet drones now equipped with LiDAR enabling the ability to see through smoke.
Putting aside how absolutely terrifying this will be when it's not the good guys blowing up an invading army - I'm surprised there's no directional filtering solution, for radio waves. You have a pretty good idea which direction adversarial signals will come from.
Alternately, given sudden overwhelming signal strength, the drone could fly toward the source with malicious intent.
Home on jam is classic missile technology. Ukraine should put it in their drones!
I thought autonomous killbots were still not used (officially,) outside like Israel. There is some agreement not to go full autonomous, not sure the signatories. Anyone have any confirmation on this?
They're saying two different things in the post. One is that a drone is flown to a location and then automatically attacks whatever it encounters, that's fully automatic and would be aweful imo because then the drone is making decisions on what to attack/kill.
The second thing is later in the post when they talk about countermeasures. They state that the drones can be countered before they're locked on to a target. That implies that an operator picks a target and the automation part only serves to keep the drone locked on the target, but the drone makes no decision on what to target. That's conceptually similar to a pilot selection an enemy aircraft they locked onto before firing a missile.
From the post it's not quit clear which of the two are the case or if both are happening. I suspect it's the second case because Ukraine can't really afford the bad publicity of the first case imo.
It's true, locking onto a target is no different than a guided missile. The Russian blogger is trying to make it sound like it's autonomous killbots, when it's guided munitions that are set on a target, by people, to avoid jamming.
It's probably not true that they're using AI for this.
Local onboard 'AI' is used for image recognition, classification and target locking usually, and it flies using essentially agrodrone software missions (ardupilot). It's not completely autonomous, just mostly hands off.
It does sound like someone clicks the right blob onscreen, so in the absence of further instruction, the drone will go give it a hug. That's missile lock-on via webcam, not a flying landmine.