I think I've asked this before a long time ago.
One of my paranoid tinfoil hat theories is that I think cringe culture was pushed by algorithms and has now has become a convenient tool for the right to groom people into policing 'otherness' more harshly. I think it's because it has that particular right-wing playbook stank to it and because I can smell that style of using shame to manipulate that right-wingers love from a mile away. Hell, this site came from a part of the left that was originally a reaction to that, using bullying but instead using it to punch back at the punchers, so to speak (although we've changed a little and good, it's not needed anymore because everyone bullies chuds now).
Cringe culture was big around 2016ish, while it mostly targeted blue hair liberals it often extended to making fun of whatever marginalized group you can think of.
It was always there, of course, but not enough to actually be taken seriously unless you had high-school bully brain. Anyone that wasn't a chud or too tech illiterate to curate their algorithm tended to lose interest. Fast forward to the 20s' and now instead of targeting specific marginalized groups or political stuff, there is a more widespread sort of bullying towards any sort of 'otherness'. Strong emotions, being passionate, being too quirky, looking out of place, being too young, being too old. Being too much of well, anything. Let's just say it's not a fun time to be neurodiverengent in particular.
So we know from those files that Gamergate (and I think some Chan spaces?) were involved with promoting right-wing idiology. Well, sure is interesting that after people started posting about the Israel genocide on tiktok, the US freaked out and took control. And now we see a massive resurgence of cringe culture, again. Alongside with other right-wing garbage (think manosphere and so on)
Of course, it's always been there and is likely just a totally organic consequence of people growing up with social media and the digital panopticon. But notice how everything that is cringe fits neatly into what the right think the left is? I wouldn't be surprised if we learn in a decade or so that all of this was at least taken advantage of by the right as a form of social policing, a way to undo all that pesky self acceptance and understanding the lgbtq community and other marginalised groups worked so hard to normalise. It's a way to punish outgroups while getting under the libs "safe to make fun of" radar (and many leftists too, you are not immune!) Seems like a good way for the right to bring back that repressive order they love so much and make everyone afraid to step out of their assigned role again.
Americans were behind the nordstream 2 sabotage.
Prince Henrik of Denmark was bisexual
I'd argue we have evidence of that in the form of the Biden admin (and even Biden himself) repeatedly saying they'd "end" Nordstream if Russia intervened directly in the years and months leading up to the SMO.
Oh there's plenty of things that point to, which is why I wouldn't be surprised.
Also, he was not the father of prince Joachim.
That one I haven't actually heard much about that doesn't just boil down to "Henrik gay -> Joachim is illegitimate" so I don't quite buy it.
The rumour I've heard is that Joachim supposedly looks a lot like the late Count Schack, who had no heirs and handed his castle, Schackenborg, over to the monarchy when Joachim was 10. They then gave it to Joachim when he was a young adult.
I'm not saying I believe it's true, but it would be funny if it were.
Another monarchy-related conspiracy I've come across is that Margrethe's abdication had something to do with a paparazzo taking pictures that showed then-Crown Prince Frederik had spent the night at the apartment of a younger female influencer in Barcelona. Making him king, the theory goes, was a way to drown out the scandal.
I don't really believe that last one, though. It's not like Margrethe stepping down didn't make sense, she was old, her health was failing, and she had already become the longest-reigning Danish monarch. Besides, the photos were already out, but the story never gained traction. Possibly because it runs counter to the cult of personality that the media and the public willingly build around the monarchy. The tale of a man cheating on his wife just didn't fit the image people want the royals to have, so they simply ignored it.
Mik Shchack and Karin Schack would have to be in on it. Given that Mik Schack was the heir in 1978 after Hans and Karin gave it up, and he turned it down because the whole thing was loaded with debt. (According to himself).
Although it is admittedly way more and better evidence than Henrik = Gay..
I have heard the abdication theory, but I didn't pay it any mind because lol she was almost 90 and her reaction to Joachim being embarassing was cutting off the whole.brach of the family tree.