this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
336 points (95.4% liked)

News

36233 readers
3129 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

If you truly believe "Gaza was a stupid cause to get hung up on" then what's your justification for her continued support of the genocide occurring there?

You act like people are stupid for making a big deal about it, while failing to give a reason why she felt it was a big enough deal to support even if it meant letting Trump win the presidency yet again.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Palestine has been a bipartisan bad take for the US the whole time. Any single issue is a bad issue to get hung up on. "Lines in the sand" are a fragmentary psy-op to get you to ignore the big picture.

Yes, every big deal is a big deal, but there are hundreds of big deals. Taking a stance on this one didn't make it any better, arguably made it worse, and also let a whole lot of other big deals get bigger.

Single-issue voting is how we got in this mess in the first place. We aren't going to single-issue vote our way out of it.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There's a difference between intentionally torpedoing peace talks and outright arming and funding a genocide against a civilian population.

Democrats have been shitty for the country for a long time, but now the mask is off and people are seeing through the virtue signaling, false promises, and outright lies. This may be a single issue, but its the straw that broke the camel's back for a lot of people and it's one issue in a sea of issues the Democrats are on the wrong side of.

We didnt get into this mess by voting on single issues. We got into it by continually electing people who are using their positions for personal gain and the gain of their wealthy donors above all else. That's the bipartisan issue. Both parties work for the same people and it isn't us. The political fights broadcast on TV and social media are just a smoke screen to make people believe we have two opposing parties, but it turns out the real opposing parties are the American people and the wealthy.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

We didnt get into this mess by voting on single issues. We got into it by continually electing people who are using their positions for personal gain and the gain of their wealthy donors above all else.

Single issues are exactly how those people manipulate your vote.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

None, but with her the US would not be destroying itself as quickly, and USAID would still be a functional agency.

I try to be a realist, and looking at Trumps regime, I don't see Harris causing more harm in total.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You make statements like "with her the US would not be destroying itself as quickly" and wonder why she didn't win the election?

You don't see the irony in saying "you must vote for either the slow destruction or the fast destruction of the country because if you don't, you're supporting the destruction of the country." How about people take their partisan blinders off already and see that limiting yourself to these two choices is what's destroying the country.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't wonder why she didn't win, the US citizens had two alternatives.

  1. An educated, experienced, boring politician.
  2. An unhinged lunatic.

The US citizens picked the lunatic.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Way to quickly back track and deflect from your last comment.

I also find it funny that everyone defending Harris and the DNC for running a train wreck of a campaign and handing the country over to Trump eventually comes around to admitting they don't even live in the US despite their strong opinions and insight into US politics.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

And then scream that anyone who isn't pro-genocide is an evil foreigner for disagreeing with netanyahu.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I try to be a realist

You realists sure do tend to lose elections. But hey, maybe you'll get enough republican votes to win next time, eh?

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago

First the Republican party would need to establish itself here in Sweden, then you would need to kill me, steal my identity and vote for them in my name, that is the ONLY way they will ever get my vote