this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2025
25 points (93.1% liked)
Anthropology
852 readers
6 users here now
Welcome to c/Anthropology @ Mander.xyz!
Notice Board
This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.
- 2023-06-14: We are looking for mods. Send a dm to @fossilesque@mander.xyz if interested!
About
Rules
- Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
- Keep it rooted (on topic).
- No spam.
Resources
Similar Communities
Sister Communities
Science and Research
Biology and Life Sciences
- !anthropology@mander.xyz
- !microbiology@mander.xyz
- !biodiversity@mander.xyz
- !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
- !palaeontology@mander.xyz
Plants & Gardening
Physical Sciences
Humanities and Social Sciences
- !archaeology@mander.xyz
- !cooking@mander.xyz
- !folklore@mander.xyz
- !history@mander.xyz
- !old_maps@mander.xyz
Memes
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I’m highly skeptical. If that’s the case why does Africa have the most current genetic diversity of anywhere in the world? We evolved in Asia and sprinted to Africa to genetically diversify, and also for some reason the humans left behind in Asia had a bottleneck? Why are our closest nonhuman relatives in Africa if we didn’t evolve there? Why does so much of the evidence fit Africa if it’s not Africa?
I find it more likely this was a member of an early population wave out of Africa that failed for some reason.
"The scientists relied in part on another similar skull to shape their model, and then compared it to more than 100 other specimens."
Why use this specific similar skull? How similar was it really? We seem to be talking about fine structures in specific areas of the skull. How do they know they picked the right one to base their reconstruction off of?