this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2025
25 points (93.1% liked)

Anthropology

852 readers
6 users here now

Welcome to c/Anthropology @ Mander.xyz!



Notice Board

This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.



About

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.


Resources



Similar Communities


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Plants & Gardening

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Memes

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The skull suggests Homo sapiens may have diverged from our ancient ancestors 400,000 years earlier than previously thought, and in Asia not Africa, the study, published on Friday, said.

I’m highly skeptical. If that’s the case why does Africa have the most current genetic diversity of anywhere in the world? We evolved in Asia and sprinted to Africa to genetically diversify, and also for some reason the humans left behind in Asia had a bottleneck? Why are our closest nonhuman relatives in Africa if we didn’t evolve there? Why does so much of the evidence fit Africa if it’s not Africa?

I find it more likely this was a member of an early population wave out of Africa that failed for some reason.

[–] karashta@piefed.social 2 points 5 months ago

"The scientists relied in part on another similar skull to shape their model, and then compared it to more than 100 other specimens."

Why use this specific similar skull? How similar was it really? We seem to be talking about fine structures in specific areas of the skull. How do they know they picked the right one to base their reconstruction off of?