Forty mayors from around the world have signed onto a pact announced Tuesday to try to shape how urban data centers are built and operated.
It’s their vision for how urban data center development can be done sustainably — and not at the expense of their cities’ natural resources, energy prices or climate targets. C40 Cities, an alliance of nearly 100 cities seeking to impact climate change, launched it during London Climate Action Week.
Many new data centers are coming to rural areas for cheap land. Experts at C40 say metropolitan areas are under tremendous pressure too, with about 1,700 data centers located in their network of cities so far. Development of data centers is expected to grow by over 40% in 50 of those cities.
C40 got involved because the mayors of Phoenix and Melbourne, Australia, came together over worries about data centers using a lot of their cities’ electricity and water, and competing with housing developers for available land.
“We found out that the challenges in every region around the world were very similar,” said Cassie Sutherland, a managing director at C40. “Our approach was to say OK, how do we now use a global mayoral voice to come together with the conditions under which they will accept data centers.”
Data centers are built in cities to be close to firms that want systems powered by artificial intelligence to respond instantaneously. Major companies locate data centers in cities to be near their business operations. And data centers tend to be built in clusters, forming ecosystems in metropolitan areas that might outweigh factors like land costs. It’s just more recently that data centers have moved out into rural areas, said Andrew Batson, global head of data center research at JLL.
Political and local opposition has been growing because of fears about blackouts, rising electricity bills and the centers’ voracious water needs. Some states are suspending tax breaks or considering moratoriums on data center construction.
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
Ugh. I'm sick of the reporting on data centers! There's only one (realistic) concern when it comes to data centers and it's this: Power consumption.
Everything else is either myths (e.g. water usage) or minor points that may or may not bother the locals (using up land that could've been a farm or a school or whatever).
Also, there's many kinds and sizes of data centers! Consider for a moment that nearly every school or modern business has a data center of some kind in their building(s). You have to put those servers somewhere!
People talk about data centers like the world just collectively decided that every single one that's ever built from now until the end of time will be as big as an airport and use up more power than a small city. That's not reality! Most data centers are just small portions of a larger business campus.
Yet now we're trying to regulate something so common and necessary that is going to pointlessly increase the costs of everything for everyone. Stop for a moment and think about it:
If we want to actually do the right thing when it comes to data center regulations there's really only one thing to be concerned about: Power usage. It's also really easy to fix!
We just need a regulation that requires all data centers over a certain size to be powered via renewable energy. BAM! Problem solved.
It's just that no politicians have the guts to force such a thing and that too drives me nuts!
Solar is already the cheapest power generation option and there's plenty of space (in the US) to install more than enough solar panels to power all the data centers in the world (really, we have so much space!). Also, data centers can be anywhere! That AI video generation service could be out in the middle of the desert in Nevada and it wouldn't have an impact on the user experience in the slightest... Even if the user was in Australia (on the other side of the world)!
While I agree, the reality is space constraints. Renewables take a lot of space (mostly solar) and data centers benifit from sharing resources. The reason northern Virginia is such a magnet for them is that box was opened 2 decades ago and they get to share resources, your house pets like to sit around the warm things dont they?
The regulatory failure is that data centers are not treated like the heavy industrial buildings that they are. Foundries take a cartoonish amount of resources to run, but you dont see towns letting them set up shop near homes. Furthermore, almost no data center gives themselves the space to run the generators and not violate half a dozen ordanences, because they either run twice a year for testing (fines are the cost of doing business) or are on 24/7 because the grid cant handle their demands. Its the latter group where the managment needs to be drawn and quartered.
My proposed regulation would be that new buildings have a land requirment based on the amount of power they intend to consume (not what is provided from the grid, they can make their own power if needed). This would force hyperscaler build outs (who already have more money than sence because these are rush jobs for AI nonsense) to buy land buffers around their noisy polluting buildings. In theory, it would protect residents better and would curb the worst of the proposed plans, like that BS in Utah.
Both our ideas require legislators and relgulators to get off their asses and sharpen their axes, and of all the things discussed, that seems the most unrealistic unfortunatly...