this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
186 points (98.4% liked)

Progressive Politics

4735 readers
522 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/8880496

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/60192

NY Post: Hateful Slate

To translate from the Murdochian, “hateful” here means being opposed to genocide, police brutality and rent-gouging (New York Post, 6/24/26).

The win by a number of progressive candidates in New York City primaries told us something about corporate media. Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post (6/24/26) surprised no one with a front page declaiming: “The Hateful Slate: Three Israel, Cop and Private Property Hating Mamdanites Win Democrat Congressional Primaries.”

(They might want to focus group “Mamdanite” again. It’s hard to say, much less shout angrily.)

But check also the New York Times, Washington Post and Wall Street Journal’s references to New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani as a “kingmaker” because he endorsed some of the day’s winners.  AP (6/24/26) referred to the “Mamdani slate” as showcasing his “rising influence.” The wire service called this a

potential headache for Democratic leaders, who fear that Mamdani and his loyalists may push the party too far left ahead of November’s midterm elections.

The barely concealed subtext is that voters didn’t elect these candidates because they vowed to fight for things their constituents want, like childcare, a billionaire tax and abolishing ICE; they’re just mindlessly following their new overlord. For these outlets, regular, working people are something to invoke, not people to actually listen to.

NYT: A Jewish Democrat's Support of Israel May Cost Him His NYC House Seat

A New York Times headline (6/17/26) obscured the fact that the Goldman/Lander race was between two Jewish Democrats.

Of course, part of the upset around the upset is because New York City’s primary results show that uncritical material and ideological support for the state of Israel and its genocidal attack on Palestinians is no longer a requirement for electoral acceptance. That shift is real, and you can watch elite media struggle.

For instance, a New York Times story (6/17/26) on the contest between Dan Goldman and Brad Lander was headlined “A Jewish Democrat’s Support of Israel May Cost Him His NYC House Seat”—but might have just as easily been headlined “A Jewish Democrat’s Criticism of Israel May Win Him a NYC House Seat.” It all depends whose views you think are worth representing.


From FAIR via This RSS Feed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

While I agree with his policies, and think many people do actually know what they want, have you met most voters?

[–] NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Socialist policies are immensely popular, even getting majority approval amongst Republicans, as long as they don't know that they are socialist policies....

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 5 points 15 hours ago

as long as they don't know that they are socialist policies....

Therein lies the irrationality

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I made a bunch of people quite upset in a prior post of this article when pointing out that people really aren't rational.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 3 points 17 hours ago

Inb4 polisci nerds offer specific definition of “rational” that renders everyone rational

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hush, Gilfoyle.

j/k just doing my part

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You're not the first to compare me to Gilfoyle, and I'm sure you won't be the last, but usually people make the connection after seeing me.

You can't see me, right?

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not even sure about the reference, but you mentioned it and I've had you tagged with it ever since. Keep on giving people that impression irl.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ha, I figured.

It's from the HBO show "Silicon Valley."