this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
116 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

871 readers
291 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://x.com/netsensor1/status/2070848281379533008

China having a coastline? Don't be silly. That's propaganda. Even if they did have one, who would they want to protect themselves from? It's not like they've ever been invaded by anyone. clueless

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 48 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

I think this may just be a case of really bad translation? Or difficulty with just knowing the right term. Someone from an island nation probably would struggle to find the word to describe a...continental(?) country, I would probably call a nation on a continent "landlocked" as a brainfart myself.

Although their question about "where do the aircraft carriers go?" does make it seem like they think China is actually landlocked.

Maybe they think Vietnam has a Chile thing going on and just stretches up along the whole coastline?

[–] Kefla@hexbear.net 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I support Long Nam on the basis that it's funny

[–] Krem@hexbear.net 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

probably 30% or more of china's population lives in that coastal strip, so viet long would be maybe 3/4 chinese which is also funny i guess

[–] Mindfury@hexbear.net 4 points 23 hours ago

500
Million
Vietnamese
Hell
Yeah

[–] EveningCicada@hexbear.net 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

geordi-no One Belt, One Road

geordi-yes One Coast, One Country

[–] kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago

now the same format with viet cong and viet long xD

[–] SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No, this person is just really that dumb. He's a Takaichi supporter, and his entire tweeting history is full of absolute nonsense. frothingfash

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 31 points 1 day ago

The internet really does enable the people who should be investigating the most and not speaking to instead speak the most and refuse to investigate.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 28 points 1 day ago

OP is from a timeline where viet nam kept going in 1979

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

内陸国, used in the original non translated tweet, literally translates to “landlocked country”. 内陸 is like interior of a landmass and 国 is country

Also if you go on their timeline their most recent retweet is some guy talking about a Chinese textbook from 1979 with no reference to the Nanjing massacre and heavily implying that because of this it’s fabricated soooooo maybe not someone worth the benefit of the doubt

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah, probably not worth giving them the benefit of the doubt. It was more just as someone from an island nation myself, I wouldn't really know the thing to call a not-island country, so I could see someone making a similar mistake. The rest of their tweet does show that they probably weren't just being ignorant of the term and were trying to disparage China somehow by calling them landlocked.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Someone from an island nation probably would struggle to find the word to describe a...continental(?) country,

Japanese does not lack terms for describing the geographic situation of China's eastern coast compared to Japan. They have an extensive shared cultural heritage, including a long period of the Japanese intelligentsia sitting in China's shadow, and then a long period of them arguing against that attitude (frequently with silly arguments like "well our monarchs are gods"), and then another, and another.

They have catalogues of taxonomies we can barely even comprehend for talking about China,* and some of it probably doesn't translate very well, but I don't think it would ever mistranslate as "landlocked" rather than something like continental, as you said.

*though I should say that while some of it appears in influential classical literature, obviously the average Japanese person doesn't know the whole thing just like we don't know the equivalent for western phrenology, but notheless some phrenological concepts are in common speech and some is familiar to us beyond that despite it having much less literary importance.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

I was erring on the side of "I'm Australian and I would probably say something dumb like that about a country that isn't an island by mistake" but it is different when you're speaking and misspeak vs typing something out for sure.

[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or they're some sort of fascist who thinks the coastal parts of China are all rightfully Japanese but "occupied" by the communists.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

Like those Japanese soldiers who think WW2 never ended, except they think that China's coastline is still occupied by the Japanese.