this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
542 points (96.4% liked)

Political Memes

12100 readers
2375 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 33 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

The USA team could have saved face and not play Balogun but they did… and no, it does not make trump look powerful because everyone knows fifa is one of the most corrupt organizations in the world

If anyone had hopes for the USA team because they are hosts or because they are underdors or whatever, that's over… now it's just trump's bitch team

[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Yes but can you imagine Trump's reaction if they didn't play Balogun and then lost? He'd whine about it forever. This way he championed a birthright citizen and thankfully Belgium won, saving both teams the acrimony of preceived cheaters winning.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

oh no! jebus forbids anything upsets the orange pedophile turd

He’d whine about it forever.

The 1 thing he does best

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml -3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

I agree with most of that. But, I'm sorry to be the one to inform you: Corruption is a form of power. The leaders of most other countries aren't getting the same privilege as the leader of the US and host nation would. If you don't acknowledge corruption as a form of power then you're really missing the problem with corruption in the first place.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Corruption is a form of power

I know this but refuse to celebrate it… therefore in my book, corruption is just trash

The leaders of most other countries aren't getting the same privilege as the leader of the US and host nation would

They probably would, they are just not petty or stupid enough to bother asking… or they would have worked it discretely

If you don't acknowledge corruption as a form of power then you're really missing the problem with corruption in the first place.

Already addressed it

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml -1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I will never understand why people think there is importance in how they decide to define things in their heads moreso than how they have an impact on the material world. Why should I care how correctly acknowledging that Trump has "power" makes you feel?

Power is not just an idea. It has actual impact on whether you acknowledge it or decide it should be seen as "power" in idealism. You calling something "powerful" isn't giving it power. The economic, military, and social connections give power.

The leader of the US will have this power whether or not you celebrate it. And I never said to celebrate it. I'm not celebrating it. I said to acknowledge it.

You seem to think you're in a movie and bending the knee or something. It's not. It's pointing to the problem.

In my opinion. Calling it "trash" is just you giving a comforting but useless response. Yeah, we all dislike it. I would hope we all hate white supremacy. But pretending white supremacy doesn't have "power" in our world would be delusional.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I will never understand why people think there is importance in how they decide to define things in their heads moreso than how they have an impact on the material world.

Let's explore…

In my world, I see a 30 year old bastard kick a child and I would react in bile condeming this behaviour

In your world, you'd be fawning over the bastard exclaming how powerful he is

Your world sucks, mine has hope for a future

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 minutes ago

No, that's where you're missing the point. In my world I acknowledge that adults are strong and have power over children. I want to live in a world where that power is checked and acknowledge that children need protection from abuse.

You understand this fundamentally with the child being hit by an adult. You react in a condemning way because you understand this power difference. I would react in the same way as you and physically intervene to protect the child.

You don't have to pretend I'm some evil person fawning over an adult hitting a child. We are disagreeing because you have an emotional attachment to the word "power" and I am using it for its material meaning to define societal structures.

You're giving away your bias and emotional definition here; having to pretend that acknowledging power structures means I am "fawning" over that power. I am not and have never once said something that should make you believe so.

You are for some reason arguing that the abusive adult is "not powerful" though? At least if I infer that from the conversation about Trump. That they are only defined by your judgement of them as "trash" or how the abuse makes you feel; and you should actively deny their power as if it somehow "takes it away" from them by not acknowledging it. But this is what I'm inferring from what you've said so far. Feel free to clarify.

Power has material attributes. Adults have power over children. Leaders of a state have power over the people of that state. Power is when Trump can command a military to bomb Iran. He has power. It is not being checked. It is not good. Acknowledging power does not give it lower. Acknowledging that that power exists and is being abused is the first step in recognizing it needs to be stopped.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 1 hour ago

In my world, I see a 30 year old bastard kick a child and I would react in bile condeming this behaviour

If all you do is condemn him then you're not making the world any better either.

They aren't "fawning" they are explaining the situation using accurate language. Trump is powerful because he can do all this corrupt shit and nothing happens to him for it. We had an entire presidency after he attempted to start an insurrection and he didn't even get a slap on the wrist. People love to talk shit about Trump but that isn't changing anything in reality.