Socialism

6867 readers

25 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 7 years ago

MODERATORS

dessalines@lemmy.ml

491

People are starting to get it (lemmy.ml)

submitted 4 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/socialism@lemmy.ml

148 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I already explained to you my position on the matter, that being that this is a terrible question because it's completely arbitrary. I don't take issue with levels of wealth, but relations of production and distribution that lead to inequality. The socialist market economy sacrificed some degree of inequality in favor of rapid and stable development, which worked, and is eroding the basis of this inequality over time.

Stop JAQing off.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 0 points 3 days ago

I was just surprised that there's no level of wealth where you'd go "okay that's too much", at least not in a way you are comfortable saying. Theoretically there is, but it's just a feeling, not any sort of number