Some will cheer, some will be mildly disappointed. But I'm out, I think.
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2026
355 points (97.8% liked)
Fediverse memes
3303 readers
209 users here now
Memes about the Fediverse.
Rules
General
- Be respectful
- Post on topic
- No bigotry or hate speech
- Memes should not be personal attacks towards other users
- We are not YPTB. If you have a problem with the way an instance or community is run, then take it up over at !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com.
- Addendum: Yes we know that you think ml/hexbear/grad are tankies and or .world are a bunch of liberals but it gets old quickly. Try and come up with new material.
- This is not the place to start flamewars between Lemmy, Mbin and Piefed.
Elsewhere in the Fediverse
Other relevant communities:
- !fediverse@lemmy.world
- !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !lemmydrama@lemmy.world
- !fediverselore@lemmy.ca
- !bestofthefediverse@lemmy.ca
- !fedigrow@lemmy.zip
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Hi 👋
Tbh makes little difference since I had him blocked, but if he uses the opportunity to finally touch grass, it's a win-win.
Did you know about the part where his illnesses make touching grass an ordeal he reduces to the minimum necessary (politics, keeping up with friends)? I get that you won't see his comments, but he said as much somewhere in this section.
Point is, he is touching grass and has plenty more opportunity. I don't see why people are hating on someone contributing so much content, most of it high quality, and bringing life to the platform. Why would less activity be a good thing?
What does that mean, exactly? There are lots of ways to touch grass that don't involve physical activity any more intense than typing. Playing a board games with your friends is touching grass, for example.
Even if it were true that he had no choice but to be terminally online, his personality is insufferable, he digs in hard to his positions and can't be reasoned with. I believe he's had drama with trans spaces (something about neopronouns, it was a long time ago) before because of that sort of thing.
I believe my last conversation with him involved him screaming at me and calling me a fascist because I said that I wouldn't believe claims without evidence. And then following me around calling me a fascist while still refusing to provide a shred of evidence for his claims. I suppose if you already agree with him on everything, you wouldn't see that side, but from my perspective he doesn't care about being persuasive or backing up his claims so much as playing to the crowd and shouting down disagreement.
Imo, comms like NCD are pure internet brain poison, "semi-ironic" glorification of the military with a veneer of liberalism. Likewise for the political compass and associated memes, it shapes the way people think about politics, massively oversimplifying everything.
Sorry that you don't like it when I provide evidence and you refuse to read it, as in the comment sections you linked.
"Something about neopronouns"
Ah, this old canard. Unsurprising that you'd spread more blatant misinformation.
Amusing that you literally link to me providing evidence multiple times.
Sorry that you don't like it when it's pointed out that you're an Uyghur Genocide denier.
Exactly what I'm talking about. You know that most people won't read through the conversations to know you're lying.
Pretty rich coming from an Italian Genocide denier.
Talk about projection.
Me providing a link (see bottom left for the exact link) to evidence in the very first comment, followed by quoting the link when disputed, and providing further evidence.
Me literally screenshotting the link provided to show where you were wrong, and pointing out that you failed to understand what I was saying entirely, followed by me providing evidence of your genocide denial (link at bottom left)
Like most Nazis, repeating lies often in the hopes that they'll be believed is all you have.
I'm talking about your accusations further down the thread. You know, the part where you call me a fascist for refusing to believe things without evidence?
What does that matter? You're also a genocide denier, regarding the Italian Genocide. Everyone on earth is a genocide denier.
No, actually, I have reason and evidence, which you lack.
Awfully funny that you post a link to a comment much further up in the thread, then. Almost like it's all disingenuous fascist bullshit. :)
lmao
You were a participant in numerous conversations with evidence regarding the Uyghur Genocide previously. Sorry that I called you out and didn't play ball with your usual technique of sealioning. :)
Anything to bootlick for genociding minorities, I see.
lmao
Yes yes, by defending myself from the accusation of being a witch, I'm calling the Church a liar and proving my guilt. By defending myself from the accusation of being a "fascist" I'm "sealioning" and proving my guilt. We've been through this ridiculous song and dance.
I'm confused. You're bootlicking the genocide of Italians too. We're all bootlicking the genocide of the bubbly wumpuses in the fairy kingdom. All through the power of imagination, after we've completely severed any concern for evidence.
No, by your repeated previous denials of evidence provided, you're proving you're a Nazi bootlicker. Sorry if that's too complex for you to understand.
Thanks for proving my point through repeated comparisons of the actual, ongoing Uyghur Genocide to notions of a fantastic genocide.
Would be weird if an ml user liked him TBH
Like I said, he's really just concerned with playing to a crowd that I'm not part of, so yeah.
Per https://feddit.uk/comment/26233735
"As someone with a laundry list of physical and mental ailments, my ‘touching grass’ time is extremely limit, and general I reserve the monumental effort there for important issues - like keeping up with the social events of my actual friends, or participating in local politics in my increasingly-fucked-and-fascist country. “Touch grass, it’s more fun than shitposting about history!” doesn’t really apply for me."
As for the rest of your comment, I'll be explicit in saying that I won't engage with it. I have read the linked comments, their context, other comments linked in that context and frankly, I don't think that will be a fruitful conversation for either of us. I hope you can respect that choice not to have it.
All I'm saying is that, regardless of the reasons, too much internet can create brainworms, bad politics, and toxicity. I've yet to hear of any physical or mental ailment that makes it impossible to log off.
Sure. You asked, I answered. I mostly linked them because I don't believe in saying anything negative about a person without providing evidence.
Imagine saying this as an Uyghur genocide denier and PRC bootlicker.
Aren't you supposed to be logging off? Now that you've noticed I've unblocked you, I doubt you'll be able to stay away for a week.
Didn't you claim to have me blocked?
Sorry that I'm active in my fucking farewell thread, I know that's such a radical idea.
lmao.
I did have you blocked. I unblocked when I heard you left.
Your farewell thread from two days ago? Quite the Southern Goodbye.
What's the logic there, I'm curious. Other than, of course, the usual logic of repeating blatant misinformation and genocide denial wherever you can?
Sorry that you think a thread is timed like a real-world conversation? lmao.
I prefer to keep a short blocklist.
I'm just wondering what the statute of limitations is here. Are you still gonna be in your farewell thread next week? Next month?
Don't worry, I'll block you again soon. I know you can't resist engaging with me.
I'll probably check up intermittently as long as it's active, and when it's inactive, I won't be here. Sorry that you think it's regulated by some law?
Cute coming from someone who unblocked me specifically to engage with me. :)
I responded to your dogshit any time I see it, regardless of whether or not you had me blocked, so I don't know what you think that blocking me changed, lmao.
Typically people leave after saying goodbye but ok.
Well, when I see you baselessly accuse me of things, I of course reply to defend myself. And then you reply and we get into the whole thing where I keep asking you to provide a shred of evidence to substantiate your beliefs, and you reply that one must not test our Lord God the State Department and that blessed is he who believes the US government without having seen and skepticism is the tool of the devil, blah blah blah. And since you can't seem to resist preaching your holy gospel or chastising the faithless skeptics, I think I'm making it harder for you to abide by your decision to leave. So, for both of our sakes, I will now block you again.
Imagine going to a farewell party and being surprised that the person leaving is attending, lmao.
Cute, considering that you've been in numerous disputes on that matter, and were provided with reliable sources which you rejected as "Adrian Zenz" despite the fact that the vast majority of the evidence provided in said sources had nothing to do with Zenz.
But hey, genocide deniers aren't here because you listen to evidence. You're here because you're fascist bootlickers who love the slaughter of minorities, as long as it's by 'your' camp.
Don't know why you felt the need to announce that since pretty clearly blocking me is apparently meaningless to you, but okay.