this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
42 points (100.0% liked)

electoralism

22273 readers
14 users here now

Welcome to c/electoralism! politics isn't just about voting or running for office, but this community is.

Please read the Chapo Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Shitposting in other comms please!

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has been bandied about as a potential “socialist” candidate for the Democratic nomination for the 2028 Presidential race. She is a member of our own organization, Democratic Socialists of America, and her positions are widely seen as representative of our own in the eyes of many. Many of our comrades, for whatever reason, seem adamant that she enter the contest in 2028, and we commit time and resources to her run. This is a very bad idea for a myriad of reasons.

First, AOC is not a socialist. She is a social democrat. A socialist, in the Marxist sense, is one who fights for the dictatorship of the proletariat, and the overthrow of the ruling class. In essence, a socialist puts the working class, the proletariat, in the driver’s seat, and does not see co-governance with the bourgeoisie as an ideal. This is not a purity test, this is the ABCs of Marxism. Without a firm foundation in Marxism, there is no socialism, no socialist party, no anything. To turn away from this foundation is to vulgarize and throw away centuries of class struggle and theoretical understanding purchased with the blood of millions of workers at home and abroad. AOC has identified her idea of socialism as a strong welfare state, akin to European monarchies such as Norway, Denmark, and the UK. Socialism deals with the question of power, class power, not individual power. Communists center our organizing around the struggle of power, in which our class must come out victorious. Failure to recognize this leads to opportunism and the continued march of imperialism across the world. It is a bourgeois habit to see power for celebrity politicians as being power for our class. Does AOC serve the people and our organization, or does she serve herself? If we endorse and work for her, will it be for the proletariat, the global proletariat, or will it be for the aggrandizement of a politician and a handful of connected people on her staff and in her circle? Is this proletarian politics? No.

Secondly, American imperialism will never let an actual socialist manage its affairs. In this country, real socialists, usually Black, do not get invitations to conferences in Munich, or the Met Gala, they get driven into exile, imprisoned, railroaded, driven insane, and shot dead. Imperialism is masterful when it comes to capturing energy and channeling it back towards dead ends, and centrists are already circling like vultures. The consequence of a few primary defeats will most likely be a call to endorse Gavin Newsom or whatever other ghoul rears their head for the nomination, in exchange for a trifling cabinet seat. This will not benefit DSA, it will embarrass us in front of the masses, and will serve to carry us down the road of right opportunism, when we need to be standing in front of the movement. Running a candidate, seriously, for the head of the US empire, as a Democrat, is a recipe for confusion and hypocrisy. Our task is to dismantle this empire, not seek to put one of our members at the head of it. America will never cease to manufacture death, it will never cease to exist on stolen land, it will never cease to steal and commit every type of crime the world over. Failure to understand this is failure to understand America, failure to understand America means that you are not a political actor, you are simply a rudderless boat tossed and turned on an ocean of blood.

Thirdly, continued waffling on Palestine. DSA should not make a habit of rewarding bad behavior with labor and endorsements. After announcing, to great fanfare, at a forum the other day that she intended to rectify her previous positions which attracted criticism, she went on to declare that she sees Israel as an ally and vomited up more soft Zionist slop. Israel still has the right to an Iron Dome, and to exist, it should just pay for it itself! Palestine is the compass, the North Star, not a “side issue” about which you can lie to the people to extract an endorsement. Instead of humbly accepting criticism from comrades in the organization that she continues to demand labor and endorsement from, and actually doing better, she habitually lashes out at comrades who seek to hold her accountable. This is the behavior of bourgeois politicians, not a people’s tribune.

In short, no, we should not endorse AOC for either Congress or a hypothetical run for President. Raise up proletarian politics and abandon mimicking the bourgeoisie with a socialist veneer. Cast away opportunist illusions, prepare for struggle.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MarxMadness@hexbear.net 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I'd say you make a public statement that your support is conditional on maybe two pledges, for example:

  1. End U.S. aid to Isrsel.
  2. Forgive all student loan debt for the entirety of your term.

Pick one foreign and one domestic. Make them big demands, make them popular, make them simple, and make them something the president directly controls.

  • If she pledges to do those things at all, you've shown your organization is a major influence at the highest levels of national politics, which is useful for all sorts of things.
  • If she refuses, you've forced her to tell the public where she really stands, and you distinguish socialists from the Democratic Party.
  • If she pledges and wins, you can take part of the credit whether she actually does anything towards them.
  • If she pledges and loses, you learn something about what needs to be done going forward.
  • If she wins and doesn't follow through, you radicalize some of the people who voted for her.
  • If she wins and follows through even partially, you've gotten at least part of what you want.
[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If she wins and doesn't follow through, you radicalize some of the people who voted for her.

AOC is popular af with the normies, I think this would lead to disengaged apathy rather than marxists and anarchists. It's not the same thing as Kamala building her entire career on offering nothing and failing to give us even that.

[–] MarxMadness@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago

On the other hand, the last time someone ran to the left of most Democrats, won, and then largely failed to deliver (Obama), I think that led pretty directly to the revival of interest in socialism that started around the time of the 2016 Bernie campaign.

[–] hotcouchguy@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Could a president unilaterally declare Israel a "state sponsor of terror"? I bet various other sanction methods are available without Congress. She could certainly tariff them 10000%

[–] ClimateStalin@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

I do believe that is something the president can unilaterally do.

Also remember that our relationship with Israel is illegal under US law. We have domestic laws on the books to prevent us from supporting countries committing genocide. And the president controls the Justice and State departments responsible for enforcing those laws.

[–] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Netanyahu already said iϟϟntreal wants to stop receiving financial aid for arms from the US and can pay for its own weapons. "Ending aid" will not achieve anything and isn't enough. The principled demand must be to designate iϟϟntreal an enemy state.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think netenyahu is bullshitting here. I don't think anything can replace the usa support for it's colonization of the middle east

I heard it's a shell game. Deny money for weapons, take increased money to subsidize other projects, use the money saved on those to buy the weapons

[–] free_casc@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

Netanyahu already said iϟϟntreal wants to stop receiving financial aid for arms from the US

I'm not really taking this at face value, he has every reason to stand up there and lie and keep receiving aid anyway.

The principled demand must be to designate iϟϟntreal an enemy state.

All well and good, I personally fully agree of course, but this is not going to be on the table for an AOC presidential candidacy. This being c/electoralism, the scope of our discussion is going to have a lot to do with what we can expect to extract from the bourgeois system. It's lib as hell ofc (cause it's the electoralism comm), which also means that doing the right thing (crushing capitalism on the first day in office) is a losing strategy. Even AES states preserve relations with Israel, and I have no expectation that a "socialist US" (beyond an AOC presidency, I mean) would be leading the way on this.

Then again, if President AOC were to cut ALL aid to Israel (perhaps under pressure from the DSA), the Israeli state as we know it would certainly going to collapse due to its own fascism. At that point it won't really matter if they are designated as an enemy.

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

adopt Netanyahu & biden policies as a demand of socdemery party 🥀🥀🥀 i’ve seen enough, send her in