this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
128 points (97.1% liked)

Rust

8136 readers
59 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits

  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

C is firmly in the "not fun" camp with PHP, JavaScript and Bash. I'd say even assembly is more fun, in a puzzle challenge sort of way.

The most fun language I've used is QuakeC, because the only thing you can do with it is write Quake mods. It was a pretty neat language too from what I remember. It even automatically detected infinite loops!

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

We all have different definitions of "fun." C won't surprise you when you try to add a string and an array; it'll do exactly what you told it to do, which then translates to assembly code with a very predictable pattern.

On a different note, bash scripting is well-defined and mostly consists of understanding that common tools can be chained together to provide useful output; combined with the very well-defined string operations, I've found that bash scripts can address over 99% of cases people try to throw sed and awk at. It's almost surprisingly powerful.

JavaScript is just a hot fucking mess.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

C won’t surprise you...

Lol... I'm sure there's a meme or graph for where you are in learning C to believe this.

then translates to assembly code with a very predictable pattern.

Even this is a stretch. Modern C compilers can do some wild transformations. I assume you've seen the classic one where UB makes it jump to a function that you never actually call.

bash scripting is well-defined

Yeah I mean Bash's problem isn't that it's poorly defined - it's that the definition is awful!

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I've been programming for 35 years, and professionally for over 20, so I'm pretty far along the curve, thanks.