this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2026
569 points (94.5% liked)
Work Reform
16891 readers
118 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There was an experiment where they simulated LLM performing various company roles. The higher you put it, the more effective it was... xD
LLMs are great at being generalists.
They'd be better CEOs and VPs than most CEOs and VPs.
They read reports that more competent specialists make, and talk with other high level generalist/aggregator people who do the same.
AKA, they summarize complex data into a narrative and chat.
LLMs probably cost less than CEOs and VPs do.
So why are we trying to jam LLMs in to do the much more complicated jobs they are not so great at doing?
Oh, right, its because the owner class are delusional narcissistic sociopaths who just want to feel appreciated and superior to others... and none of this is about making a better run company.
Its about enforcing a social caste system.
IIRC article well enough, pros were that they were able to talk to anyone at company at the same time, had all data available constantly and were great at drawing normal from data so in standard scenarios they could easily lead the company.
They hallucinated sometimes, but research found that not more than actual CEO's lol.
What they failed at was exceptional, bad situations. Too little data resulted in choices that ended with the simulated board firing them.
This is exactly what I mean.
They just actually can do these kinds of tasks as well as people.
... and they'd be less expensive to run, in those roles, than the humans that currently have those salaries and stock options.
Unrealistic, boards haven't fired or assasinated Elon yet, this is blatant anti-clanker bias.