this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2025
88 points (98.9% liked)
Slop.
749 readers
413 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
ML is an ideology/theoretical framework that is not itself relations of production and is aimed at producing a socialist relations of production, so I think it's still a bit silly.
Good summary of many leftcom positions, I think. As far as I can tell, it's mostly this kind of rigid "this is my definition of socialism, anyone who does not instantly implement it is not a socialist regardless of the material conditions they are working in" stuff.
I would like to meet one of these people in person. I mean, I'm sure they'd be horrified at me since I'm very opposed to dogmatism, am not a Marxist, and simply believe that working and oppressed people must seek to elevate themselves via attaining political power. If there is some version of Marx out there that is more concerned with forming a utopia where no form of exploitation takes place, they can keep him! I'll stick with reading the notes of the revolutionaries that have actually done something.
True I think the fact I can just tell them "look, I'm not a Marxist, I'm a Catholic that dabbles in Marxist texts and I'm not interested in upholding any kind of ideological purity" instead of telling them that actually I read Marx right and they read him wrong would make them less angry.