Suggests that foam padded hard helmets protect against traumstic brain injury by dispersing the energy of the impact, but are less effective in preventing concussion caused by translocation (the sudden head movement which causes internal displacement of the brain). No support to say the soft helmets have an appreciable impact in AFL against either TBI or CTE.

That's not to say that helmets have a net negative impact, unless the argument is that decreased FOV means you have less ability to avoid the imapct in the first plave

[–] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Would it not increase the instances of translocation? You're less likely to run at full speed at someone else if neither party were wearing armour.

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yep, that's what other commenters have replied

https://hexbear.net/comment/6727690

The increased risky play taken by players more than invalidates the benefits of the gear itself. I was getting hung up about the gear in a vacuum since I don't follow codes where it's already a settled topic

Idk how you'd put the genie back in the bottle in gridiron though if players, coaches and audiences are used to the current high impact play, then you'd have to reel that back in before players may feel comfortable doffing the gear