this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2025
960 points (99.1% liked)

Political Memes

2034 readers
318 users here now

Non political memes: !memes@sopuli.xyz

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 63 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Make it a one way trip for him please..

Also, he's not allowed to take his money and assets with him, leave and disperse those assets for the rest of the people here.

He can go dig for his own gold and shit and establish his own worthless economy on his dead rock if he wants, assuming he would even survive...

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Mom I want a planet to destroy. We have a perfectly good planet to destroy at home. The planet we have at home:

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

His father probably asked him "why just limit yourself to just one?" I mean... he's racked up the offspring, so why not destroy every possible option of a place for them to live?

[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Most of his offspring fucking hate him.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

and no communication devices, cameras or things like that. I don't want to hear from him again.

[–] Pringles@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can we blow up the ship halfway and call it an oopsie?

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Or just land it several thousand kph faster than planned.

[–] Pringles@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 weeks ago

Show kph but use mph might do the trick

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As I understand it, There's no way with current technology for a trip to Mars to be a round trip thing really. It's a one and done.

Mars colonization was intended for the first settlers to settle. Not return.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Technically we totally could, if you can ship 1 kilogram to mars you can ship a spaceship to mars capable of getting back with enough un-manned trips in advance. Economically feasable however it is not.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

it's even really difficult technically, because you have to keep the propellant cool on the surface of mars while you stay there, which is really difficult. in outer space, it's possible because there's only sunlight as a heat source, and if you create a shadow, then it's chilly as fuck, but on the planet surface, winds will carry heat to the fuel deposit and eventually warm it up, and cooling that amount of propellant is expensive (energy-wise) as fuck.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Ferry stage in orbit and solid fuel first stage? Could probably get away with it in martian gravity.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago

money and assets with him

The money is of no use on Mars, and billionaires can't relocate many of their assets anyway

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Let "it" take the money along, it will be of no use there and won't be available on the market here, if anything, it might counter inflation for a week or two to remove it from Earth.

[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

Looking at progress of his rocket launch, the trip would end early.

[–] RecursiveParadox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Let me introduce you to a show called, For All Mankind. It's on Apple TV here in Europe, not sure about the rest of the world.

Spoiler: you get exactly your wish.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He famously claimed that you could give Mars an atmosphere and terraform it with nukes. He should try that once he gets there.

[–] Deathray5@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 weeks ago