1043
Newly released Epstein file links Trump to murdered newborn baby dumped in Lake Michigan
(www.rawstory.com)
this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2025
1043 points (98.7% liked)
politics
26834 readers
1955 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Is it just an unfounded report by a single person with no evidence? I bet the fbi got a bunch of crazy shit reported.
If there’s any evidence of this being true let’s see it.
Yeah, let's ask the person to testify in court. We'll charge Trump with conspiracy to commit murder and then we'll have them testify and a jury can decide if he's guilty. Just like everyone else in this country should have to face.
That's not how it would work even for an ordinary person. This is an accusation about something rather far-fetched happening 35 years before the accusation was made, with no evidence for it except the accusation itself. It wouldn't lead to criminal charges.
you don't know when they first contacted the police or FBI. also you have no idea what evidence was collected. your acting like you know something. you don't. yet all we can see is that is was an accusation, but claiming you know when the accusation was made or what investigations have been done is pure bullshit, so kindly shove that back up your ass where you got it from.
It’s hearsay at best as-is. Compile some evidence first otherwise it would be dismissed.
It's not just hearsay when its in the context of everything we know about Epstein, Trump, and how they've been named together in previous, similar case(s).
Top legal minds of Lemmy are in this thread today.
Nah man, just not an idiot. Maybe in a vacuum this would be hearsay, but it's not in a vacuum is it
Compile in some kind of FBI file?
Gosh, we should really get on that.
There's another report in the files where a woman did report her rape to the police and she was later found dead with her "head blown off". Under a functional justice system that would be thoroughly investigated, under our system it was quickly ruled a suicide because she took "bad cocaine".
These papers are being released because our justice system did not protect these victims. It is up to the public to ask questions and we need not presume innocence of the powerful as they failed to protect the vulnerable.
THAT piece of paper is evidence.
It’s likely one of many reasons Trump is so anti-FBI in his first term, train his followers to think they can’t be trusted.
It’s not evidence of a crime. It’s a report. Someone said it, it got written down.
I’m not saying it is or it is not true.
That’s not what the Epstein files are. They’re literally any paperwork related to him, even the tips from kooks. Some reaches the level of evidence, most is cruft.
This "paperwork" suggests that TRUMP murdered a newborn and dumped it into a lake after having SEX with a CHILD.
Are YOU suggesting that we treat it as gossip or should we look a bit closer???
I’m saying an accusation can be made by anyone, and does not automatically constitute fact. Its presence in the file doesn’t mean the claim was substantiated.
This accusation was not made by "anyone". It was made by the woman who watched him murder her newborn.
Why would she say that? Money? Fame? Power? She currently HAS none of that.
To shift blame? For attention? Mental illness? We don’t know enough of the context. Was it investigated? What was the outcome? Was it deemed credible?
Credible enough to remain in the files.
Again, the files are a dump of everything they have related to Epstein. There is no credibility threshold.
I noticed that there is NOTHIING from ME in the Epstein files. I said lots of things about him.
You made a formal complaint about him to the FBI, did you?
No, what a shame we only have one way to purge evil from our society. But maybe I've pre-judged him.
They don't delete reports from record when they're deemed not credible. Not even when they're proven false.
The report was made a couple months before the 2020 election. Many others also made wild reports. I saw two others in the Epstein files made literally 6 days for the election.
There are plenty of reasons to make up a story.
But sure, they should go and investigate it. Starting with the woman and her uncle. Oh wait, I bet the uncle is dead. And I bet she took great effort to gather evidence... right...?
Like being targeted for harassment and possibly get murdered? This is not a typical rape accusation, it is made against someone who has been carrying out extra-judicial murders abroad.
This is classic rape apologetics. It is not the victim's job to collect evidence while they are distressed, that's the job of the investigators.
We don't know if the victim did nothing though, she talked to a detective for over 20 minutes and so far we have not seen any documents regarding that conversation. She could have even done more than you, but we should not expect her to even though that is the response of some victims, it is not a universal response.
The files also contain two other reports about Trump abusing girls, made literally one week before the 2020 election. No corroborating evidence.