this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
82 points (100.0% liked)
Virtual Reality
2604 readers
39 users here now
Virtual Reality - Quest, PCVR, PSVR2, Pico, Mixed Reality, ect. Open discussion of all VR platforms, games, and apps.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The only successful thing they’ve come up with in the Cook era is the Watch and I wouldn’t be surprised to find that Jobs had been working on that before he popped his clogs.
I'm still not convinced that the Apple Watch is even technically a good product considering the price vs. features vs. durability vs. etc. comparison with all of its competitors. It's a successful fashion accessory.
It seems a frequent reminder is required that Apple is not a tech company. They're a marketing company, and a very successful one. Whatever it is they actually make is a side project compared to trying to convert it into a status symbol that'll replicate the popularity of the iPod and iPhone.
lol if they really thought a face computer so big and bulky and limited and heavy would be a status symbol. I think they genuinely thought that they’d have people on planes wearing these making people jealous enough to fork the money, but it was never practical for that.
The Apple Watch is only a successful product because of the iPhone. It is just a convenient second screen for that, that also happens to track some useful health measures under a guise of privacy.
If Apple is forced (as they are in the EU) to allow third party devices like withings and garmin to interact with notifications as first class citizens, then Apple Watch sales will likely drop off a cliff. Or Apple will innovate. My bet is on the dropping off a cliff though.
No they didn’t lol it was essentially an expensive dev kit. They needed devs to make a ton of cool apps before it could reach mass appeal.
Obviously no one knows their internal sales projections, but I highly doubt they expected to sell a ton of them.
This article is literally about them cutting their projections of sales, so they clearly expected to sell more than they did / project to.
The comment I replied to was talking specifically about their belief that Apple wants things that are status symbols. I was stating it’s laughable if they wanted that for this device, because it was never an appealing device.
It was weird that they thought they could sell enough of these at this price point for it to make sense to release it as an actual product instead of a dev kit at all. I don't think anyone besides them and Apple fanboys looked at this and felt it made any sense from a business standpoint. Not even people who are very much committed to VR being the future.
The article is a ton of assumptions based on a single fact. Apple cut production of Vision Pro.
Do you think apple expected to keep production at the same levels since the time of release?
Every single product they make produces at maximum levels close to release, and then ramps down as time goes on, minus a few exceptions. I would imagine apple didn’t expect one of their most expensive products to be an exception.
It seems like the article takes a single fact, and then tells you what to think.
You are correct about one thing, their belief that apple was expecting people to buy this simply as a status symbol is indeed pretty stupid.
AirPods
Yeah, OP said "successful thing" but I would make distinction of actual product vs an accessory to existing product. AirPods are essentially forced on you if you have iPhone, now that phone jack is gone. If you use other Bluetooth devices you just not perceived as "cool".
Speaking of "cool" I think Vision Pro failed, because it makes one look like a tool. Not only looks bad, but they also spent 3.5 thousands on it.
I would argue that Apple Watch is also just an accessory to the iPhone.
What do you consider a success?
I’d say a single product generating more revenue than the entirety of a company like Nintendo, or Spotify, a success.
So apple was selling a $20 EarPods, removed the phone jack to start selling $250 air pods generating $18 billion in revenue and calling this a success? I suppose if the objective was to get more money out of the users, it can be called that.
I never accused Apple fanboys of being smart.
Yeah ok, you aren’t interested in an actual discussion. That makes sense. Facts never matter to people like you. Have a good day sir.