News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
Everyone knows the crime is Criticizing Dear Leader, but they don't have the laws in place for that yet so they're improvising.
“You got an uphill battle here, counselor. She did look at him crossways.”
Imagine that. 200 protesters, but she was the only one obstructing a roadway. That must have been crazy. 199 protesters safely protesting and this one crazy lady out in the road. /s
Should make the defence easy though.
Hopefully she can counter sue for first amendment violations.
If you read the article, the violation occurred earlier. They just identified her and arrested her then.
It’s all bullshit obviously, but I doubt the case will be cut and dry if they decide to pursue.
They probably have video footage or her uncovered face in the roadway after being instructed to move. Or she may have been doing something to stand out, from others, like yelling, getting close to officers, or organizing.
Even when protesting against a better government, remember to cover your face, especially if you plan to defy officer orders or do something more… extreme.
I got the impression she was a leader. It they will arrest you for being in the road, mask up!
Her actual 'crime' was organizing the protest.
The protest which was, as far as I can tell, entirely peaceful.
So... yeah.
That's effectively a crime now.
... do people see why some of us have been calling for more uh, ... effective means of resistance, for some time now?
They can and will 'just arrest everyone'.
They'll bankrupt the country doing it.
The movement needs to go through this more naive phase and reflect on the results so that it can mature and adjust strategies. It's easy to learn about history, see what finally worked in the past, and think that we should just 'skip to the end,' but that's not how large groups of people operate. You can expect an individual to learn from history and do what's most effective, but groups must always go through the entire process because the group infrastructure has to be built brick by brick.
... So you're saying we're just doomed as a species to eternal tragicomedy?
First as tragedy, n++ times as farce?
I... can't really realistically argue against that, but goddamnit is that depressing.
I only said we have to go through the process, but there's no reason we can't speed it up or prepare better for the consequences. I think the role of those who learn from history is to work behind the scenes to soften the blows we know are coming to those who learn the hard way, and ease the transition from one phase to the next.
In more concrete terms, maintain solidarity even with people you think are making a mistake, and prepare for the moment they are ready to do more.
Climate change is irrevesible and will ultimately destabilize the geopolitical situation to the point it will directly or indirectly kill billions of people this century... unless our species can demonstrate a hitherto unseen level of international cooperation and coordination.
Instead, the world's dominant hegemon twice elected a belligerent, incompetent, fascist, rapist pedophile warmonger.
... We don't have the time to go through the process. By the time people are ready to do more, it won't matter, nothing they do at that point will be able to outrun the inertia of the systemic collapse that's now baked into the proverbial cake.
We are two decades too late to try to do an anti-fascist, counterbalance version of accelerationism.
The magnitude of the tragicomedy simply intensifies as time progresses.
Welcome to Trump's Amerikkka
The article implies the officers identified her from blocking the roadway prior to the interview along with all the other protesters.
The interview happened after.
But kinda telling of the 200 people they only identified and arrested her.
Note that they apparently didn't arrest her when they saw her doing it.
They waited until when she was in front of a news cameras again because they wanted to make an example out of her.
The protest she was being interviewed about had previously been marching through the street...