374
Trump threatens to block ExxonMobil from Venezuela after CEO calls country ‘uninvestable’
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
374 points (98.7% liked)
News
36557 readers
2110 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"I'm not showing up to your party."
"Well fuck you, I'm not inviting you then!"
OK?
Seriously, Americans, how the fuck did this guy win two elections? Please make it make sense.
If you are brave enough watch fox news and it might explain why. The facts run scared, the conspiracy theories are king, and hate grows on trees.
Grandma and grandpa didn’t die fast enough.
Bullshit, Trump won the young votes too.
Yay pod casts.
Thanks Joe Rogan!
It was the young vote that did it sadly.
Yes, and I'm so tired of hearing people blame every political illness on the older generations.
In the 70's we had peace movements and protests to make a better world like nothing you see today.
As I see it, it's the young generations that are failing today. There is no idealism, no goals for a better future that they fight for.
The R/D split is only like 53/47 for the baby boomers. It's not like they're a solid red demographic.
He's basically an amalgamation of all the worst qualities of the average American. He represents more Americans than he doesn't. This is something we Americans need to come to terms with since a lot of us are in denial about that.
yup, it really shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone truly familiar with america as a whole, anyone not stuck in a bubble.
dumb as shit and the only reason for relevance is his daddy's name, yet completely convinced of his own superiority. that shit is about as universal as it gets in america. and it's the perfect setup to run a puppet government
the extra funny/sad part is that all it would take for dems or anyone else to beat em is just...be authentic, for once in their miserable lives. that's literally all it takes, but these coastal elites who have been trained their whole lives to be career politicians are completely incapable of that because they're barely human anymore.
had kamala stuck to her "free universal healthcare" shtick instead of flip-flopping immediately once her campaign advisors told her that was polling bad with their donors, she would have won.
americans were promised "hope and change" by Obama and all they got was more corporate kickbacks and pointless wars, establishment politicians seem convinced things can still "return to normal" (ie. unsustainable ratfucking) when trump is gone which is why they're doing the absolute minimum to stop him and co. now
personally...i think shit goes from bad to much worse when/if he croaks mid term.
Do they also have ivory towers?
81% of the population lives in coastal states. Are you saying inland politicians are more authentic? Or are you playing the classic Republican spiel that them city folk are the cause of all the problems? Because I haven't seen any evidence to back either claim.
...the US doesn't have proportional representation for presidential elections, nor for the House in most states considering how gerrymandered everyt is, so it doesn't matter where most of the people live.
until it does, how rural america sees you is all that matters. you want to win battleground states, you have to atleast be able to pretend to be an actual person.
doesn't matter what your positions are, becaude most US voters are just selfish anyway, be a complete piece of shit long as you come off as a "real" piece of shit.
The President isn't elected in a popular vote, and small states in the middle of the county have vastly more relative voting power than states on the coasts? It isn't that inland politicians are more authentic. It is that inland voters, who have double the voting power, choose to vote for people who ACT like salt of the earth, whether they are from a long-wealthy family or not. So if you act like a coastal elite, you are at a disadvantage compared to someone who acts like a cowboy even though they went to Yale. Or if you talk like a normal person and use complete sentences, you are at a disadvantage to someone who yells and screams about being a Christian even though they aren't.
So they believe one act and not the other, despite the behavior (and votes in congress) to the contrary. So we're back to lack of education being the problem, unless you're a conservative, in which case it's a benefit.
Pretty much, yeah. Millions of Americans still think the guy who would be cool in high school is a better leader than the biggest nerd in school. They vote for the guy they want to have a beer with.
Also, millions of Americans care more about saving their money in taxes over hurting other people.
Yeah, I had that conversation. Someone would rather pay more for healthcare than have someone who doesn't 'deserve' it have access.
Well said. The establishment learned nothing.
Maybe the mold will be broken I suspect false vote rigging indictments coming on dems fall 2027 in the lead up to the presidential election.
Might be able to retake it in the succession fight, but not with newsome running as status quo. Even if they did squeak a win past r cheating, denial, they would do nothing with it, be unpopular, hand it right back.
As if keeping things from getting as bad was acceptable, we need a New Deal.
Either we give it to them, or fake populist fascists will.
i do allow myself a smidge of optimism, with mamdani winning NYC's mayoral election.
if an open and honest socialist can win major seat in the most crooked/establishment heart of america, then progressives can win any seat in the country.
Mamdami is absolutely a template for how progressives can win nation wide. But the key is to treat it is as a toolkit, not something to be copy-and-pasted exactly. Mamdami wouldn't win in, say, Idaho, but there are people who can. They just have to keep hammering on the shit that matters to the average voter.
Biden and Kamala sank because they promised to keep doing exactly the same shit they'd been doing for the last four years, while refusing to acknowledge how much worse the average person's quality of life had gotten over the last four years. Mamdami won because he focused, hard on cost of living issues. Make that your core message and people will flock to you. Healthcare and groceries. That's what it's all about right now.
It's really surprising and disappointing how many of my countrymen are assholes.
The only viable opposition party is deeply corrupt and doesn't know how to campaign anymore
This guy is the quintessential american. If you take the average of all United States residents, this is exactly what pops out. Its not surprising at all.
Well, no
You just have to scrape the grease traps of the southern states, and roll that average american together. Most Americans hate these turds
dumb as shit, completely convinced of his own superiority, and his only reason for relevance is his family name. that shit is relatable as fuck to rich/poor alike.
sprinkle in a bit of racism, an incredibly under-educated population, and an extensive propaganda machine and it should be no surprise he wins...mostly just from coming off as "authentic".
his polling was worse when he read from scripts, him going off script on completely batshit insane tangents made him "real" instead of just another career ratfuck politician
and of course the real kicker...most americans are short-sighted and greedy as fuck (which also makes trump relatable) and will just vote for whoever promises them the most $
This is how much enough Americans don’t trust women in leadership roles. They’ll make all sorts of excuses to explain it away, but at the heart, they just don’t like women.
God I hate this reductive take. Yeah, it played a part in it (especially in 2016) but it wasn't THE reason Trump won. And any time this is brought up, nobody talks about how many votes they DID get for being women.
Both nominations were forced on us...two establishment Democrats when the country needs change. They'd be unpopular candidates if they were men, too. Hell, I'm starting to believe they were chosen because Democrats wanted to have "sexism" in their back pocket as a scapegoat.
There were no good reasons not to vote for them but pinning it all on sexism is such a cop out. I'd say Democrats need to take some damn responsibility but lord knows the ones in power benefit from a Trump presidency, too.
"Is it our platform and inaction on the face of fascism what makes people not like us? No, it must be sexism!"
Note that I said “enough” voters. Of course it’s not the only reason, but considering an incredibly boring and too-old candidate in Joe Biden beat him while two qualified women lost to him (especially the second time where we knew what we were signing up for), I think it has to be taken into account.
It was such a minor factor both losses but it's the #1 thing that constantly gets brought up when either election is discussed. A woman running a good campaign would have won but both Clinton and Harris sucked.
Election interference had a significantly bigger impact than the gender of either candidate but we've just stopped talking about that for some reason.
And now people are using it as an excuse for never running another female candidate for president ever again. Women as a whole are suddenly unelectable because we tried it twice with two terrible options, thus "proving" that people won't vote for a woman president. It's maddening.
I didn't even think of that but now I'm pissed about it, too. We need a new party