Had some fun with this. Rules:
- When a tankie post comes up, post a legitimate, fair argument. Do not argue in bad faith. No matter how nasty the post may be. Legitimately combat the disinformation there by going into their bubble and posting a sane response.
- Watch the responses come in. Especially if the post is on the tankie triad.
- Don't feed the trolls. Don't respond to anything, unless there is actually a legitimate attempt to have a legitimate discussion. Otherwise, start a game of tankie bingo to help prevent yourself from responding to the madness.
Suggestions for expansion welcome.
Youseall will pry NATO pedia from my cold dead fingers. But I'd never describe it as "objective source of truth". That's not even how Wikipedia describes itself. I didn't know anybody would think of it this way.
All highschool teachers are tankies now?
Still waiting for a single lib to admit that Wikipedia says nobody died in Tiananmen square.
No see, it's the objective truth when it matches their vibes, otherwise an insidious tankie edited the page moments before they looked at it.
Can we please not use this line of argument when even the CPC admits people were killed in the streets around Tiananmen.
It's relevant in this case because the tanks in the tank man picture were leaving Tiananmen Square and the whole event here is a reaction to a thread where some user kept insisting the tanks must have either killed tank man, some other protesters, or tank man himself was executed. It's definitely useful to point out how this doesn't line up at all with any historical account of the event, even if it means being a bit pedantic about where the actual killings took place.
I agree that sometimes it can be unhelpful if fellow travelers say inaccurate or dishonest things just for effect, though.
Crit taken, it's worth admitting there were many deaths elsewhere, but there must be some importance in showing that libs don't know the most basic shit about what they're arguing.
That’s fair, I can see it’s value as part of a broader argument.
Yeah, it shouldn't be used as a "gotcha" but is really useful for libs who have started questioning their understanding of the event. Getting them to thinking about how they were taught about it, and how so much information is fabricated and so much information is left out, get them to start really thinking about the "why" their western official story of the event is so full of holes even western officials at the time weren't saying anything like it.
God, my teenage self wishes they were. So many goddamn assignments where I had to write what the idiot liberals running the school wanted to read, not what was actually true.
Exkuse mich. Venn I vent zu skool in 1936, mein lehrer told mich zat ze jews kontrol ze vorld. Are zu zaying zat mein lehrer vas ein nazi?
so thankful for objective wikipedia quoting objective CBS quoting objective Bari Weiss
Wikipedia is genuinely religious scripture to these people.
Illiterate baby tries to lecture learned scholars on the philosophy of truth