this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
159 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

803 readers
458 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Officially the DSA's goal is to incubate a socialist caucus within the dems until its large enough to break out and form its own party. That said, I don't think any of the DSA reps are actually onboard with that plan. Its more like being in a good position to start a socialist party if the Dems implode.

[–] InexplicableLunchFiend@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If their sleeper cells aren't actually on board with this "plan" then it's not a plan, more like wishful thinking. Might as well hope a centrist randomly becomes a communist after getting elected, it's as much of a "plan" as this

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago

They're not sleeper cells, they're openly socialist representatives caucusing together. But yes it is as much wishful thinking to hope our current reps would break with the dems as much as it is us getting enough socialist reps in office to do so.

[–] S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Preach borther. If you gonna do it do it already.

[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I dont think that's in the program? Sounds Socialist Majority Caucus specific.

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Dirty break strategy is a part of a national resolution to build an independent socialist party. SMC was against it and just wants to do basic entryism.

[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ugh, I should pay more attention to national, but already dealing with enough stuff at the local level.

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The forums are the only way to keep up with it and there's like 15 layers of drama that's both politically important but also deeply personal to the type of sicko who actually gets into arguments on a DSA forum. And for that reason, no one will ever dare try to help unravel it for you.

Like I could be wrong about SMC entirely but that was just my reading of peoples responses to them complaining how we're not actually doing anything to build this party.

Fwiw though it seems like the major obstacles were alternatives to actblue and ngpvan. ActBlue alternative seems to be done but the NGPVan alt is going to be a nightmare. Probably because NGPVan itself is a nightmare.