this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
893 points (99.0% liked)

News

34536 readers
3705 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

While immigration officers support the Trump administration’s goal of deporting undocumented migrants, many of them have grown ‘disillusioned’ with leadership’s tactics, according to reports

Morale is “plummeting” among federal law enforcement officers tasked with carrying out the Trump administration’s aggressive anti-immigration operation, as they complained that long hours, ambitious arrest quotas and hatred from the public, according to reports.

While officers at Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Patrol, overseen by the Department of Homeland Security, said they supported the administration’s goal of deporting undocumented migrants, many of them have grown “disillusioned” with the tactics being implemented by leadership.

More than 20 current and former immigration officials told The New York Times of their discontent in the hours following the fatal shooting of 37-year-old nurse Alex Pretti by a federal agent in Minneapolis.

It was the second deadly shooting of a U.S. citizen carried out by a federal agent in weeks, as officers clashed with protesters following intense public anger over the violence in Minneapolis.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

And that's exactly why we need to abolish ICE.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today -1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You can't abolish ice by pretending the people will eventually vanish into nowhere or get ok with public ostracism. That's marvel story, bud.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It has to be abolished via legislation. But the legislation won't pass without overwhelming public support and a willingness to primary anyone who doesn't support it. ICE was a mistake. It is beyond reform, because the only people ICE hires are people who voluntarily apply to join ICE.

At no point did I advocate letting up pressure or the ostracism these nazis have earned.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Ok we're talking different points here, let's disentangle.

There are legal procedures like aforementioned abolishing of ICE, DHS, what have you. I'm absolutely here with you my dear USAmericans.

But also there are other things like hundreds of thousands enraged men. If Trump fails today, they will grow resentful to move Vance or a worse big mouth GOP Nazi into the office tomorrow. You will either need an analog to Speziallager or some other magical measures like propaganda or forced lobotomy.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

But also there are other things like hundreds of thousands enraged men.

The way we fix that is by being credibly willing to address their problems. Actual problems, not the bullshit they've been fed. Homelessness, poverty, healthcare, wages, childcare, addiction treatment, a legal system that many of them are just now noticing is unjust and Kafkaesque, even something as simple and universal as burnout, all the evils wrought by capitalism. This is why I'm so fucking angry at centrists all the time. Their dishonestly held power within the Democratic Party has resulted in there being no party willing to address these issues with any level of credibility. Without a credible way forward, they'll find a con man who at least acknowledges that their problems exist.

Incrementalism is not a credible solution. It's a way for people who do nothing to justify doing nothing.

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Something needs to change to stop the cycle of angry people who know they have no prospects falling for fascist propaganda about how they’re going to improve things. But the camps weren’t it. The movement to rid the government of nazis was slow and complicated. It disabled significant parts of the government which slowed down the economy, delayed important work like repairing infrastructure and thus made prospects even worse than they had to be for said disillusioned young men. Then the Soviets and the Brits and the U.S. all found some people too important to remove from their posts which left the Nazism in place and bred resentment about why some people were punished for their roles and others weren’t. The Soviets liked the camps the most, but because they believed in purifying the masses’ ideological beliefs. Which is papering over some of the practical policies therein.

What saved Germany from the masses of disillusioned men was actual opportunity and rising standards of living. What’s causing a ‘conservative’ resurgence there and in the U.S. and elsewhere is the backslide in those areas. The answer is improving people’s lives, or at least not worsening them. Admitting we need to change what is and isn’t considered ‘creating value’. Focus on caring for our young and elderly and caring less about how many physical hours you must waste standing or sitting or walking around somewhere because a middle manager likes owning your time. But if we want to leave oligarchs in place to toy with our health and happiness and then put ourselves in camps every so often that’s an option too I guess. I just feel as though that’s part of the cycle, not breaking the cycle.