this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
84 points (96.7% liked)

Slop.

816 readers
436 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] purpleworm@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think this is a less likely guess, but I often think about this model that I was shown in an intro psych class:

https://www.simplypsychology.org/kohlberg.html

I think some of the phrasing might question-beg about morality a little, but if I'm willing to just take the L and accept Marxism as sociologically having what can be analyzed as a moral system even if it philosophically rejects the concept of moral values, then it works well enough.

[โ€“] D61@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

Awesome reply, I appreciate it.

Looking at the chart, I don't think this is what I was shown. Comrade NephewAlphaBravo's suggestion of Piaget's Cognitive Stages seem more like what I remember.

Simplypsychology.org page about Piaget's Cognitive Stages

Core Principals:

  1. Some individuals may never attain the later stages.

This has got to be what I remember.