this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
185 points (98.9% liked)
Slop.
775 readers
513 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's noteworthy that it's not Chomsky's system either. It's not Derrida's, Foucault's, Zizek's, or Deleuze's system. Yet the people who have power don't mind letting in these guys, who are ostensibly radicals and critics of power, to the boys' club and they're allowed to share that power a little bit. But when you think about intellectuals who do similar work and aren't anticommunists, none of them are household names. So is the intelligentsia just a thing that exists that has a vague unspecified connection to the ruling class, or is the process of knowledge production just as important for the capitalists to coopt as any other arena of economic and social intercourse?
Why are MLs specifically outside of the western intelligentsia? Can you think of one that's in the Epstein files?