this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
157 points (98.8% liked)

electoralism

22247 readers
184 users here now

Welcome to c/electoralism! politics isn't just about voting or running for office, but this community is.

Please read the Chapo Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Shitposting in other comms please!

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Zohran Maoist arc in 2026 challenge

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SickSemper@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Mao’s policy notably only targeted “bad landlords”

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That's actually pretty accurate, and it wasn't so much "Mao's policy" as just what wound up happening as a result of peasant outrage mixed with suddenly being given agency and an ideological push to redress their personal grievances. It was as I understand limited specifically to the rural landlords who lived in or near their the villages their victims did, the people who'd most directly committed crimes against their tenants, while absentee landlords who lived in cities far from their estates were spared and often given deals where they willingly gave up their claims to their former lands in exchange for party membership and jobs as bureaucrats on account of the CPC of the early 50s being that desperate for literate workers that they made a lot of "oh, you can read? If you'll take this desk job doing paperwork and make a gesture of good faith by voluntarily giving up your capital and land, we're ready to forgive a whole lot of stuff you may or may not have done" concessions.

[–] SickSemper@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be clear you said the “good landlords” were expropriated too, even if they got concessions?

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

I didn't say "good", just that the ones who weren't personally doing their crimes seem to have mostly avoided punishment and received special treatment in exchange for going along with expropriation quietly.

[–] deforestgump@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] SickSemper@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wow so he criticized capitalism but participated in it? Fucked up of him

[–] deforestgump@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] SickSemper@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Capitalism? Imperialism? Are you not?

In seriousness, it was a joke at the people comparing Mamdani to Mao, not you, comrade

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] deforestgump@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

I second the motion.

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

I live in a supposed "social democracy", nothing to do with reddit. You asked, and I answered.

[–] gay_king_prince_charles@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This statement is correct when taken sincerely

[–] SickSemper@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Only the baddies were targeted?

Landlord -> bad landlord

[–] Runcible@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

(Landlords are ontologically evil)