this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
1278 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

81161 readers
4914 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 43 points 16 hours ago (8 children)

I thought audio quality was more to do with the source and the destination. If you have a shit needle on a record or a speaker made of wood then its gonna sound like ass.

I never once thought it had anything to do with the cables. Unless they were frayed or damaged in some way.

But i am not an audiophile, i record my own music and mix etc, but never worried about cable quality before.

[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago

Once in a while I come across shorts of this audiophile showing of his gear. The cables he uses look like under sea cables, like he's pulling 40kV out of his wall socket. It's so ridiculous

[–] hank_and_deans@lemmy.ca 28 points 13 hours ago

I was buying a receiver and speakers in 2020 and when it came time to pick out speaker wire, the salesperson walked over to where the wire was and began the pitch...

Salesperson: so when the frequencies are higher the electrons end up traveling only on the outer layer of the wire instead of in the middle...

Me: yeah, skin effect, I did electrical engineering

Salesperson: ah, so I guess you know you don't need this then (pointing to gimmicky monster speaker cable that had a single strand of wire in a spiral around the main bundle with a clear jacket so you can see it)

Me: correct (grabs the cheapest 16awg)

[–] Stiggyman@ani.social 2 points 8 hours ago

Yep cables only matter in terms of preference. Unless we are going so cheap it’s barely holding on

[–] iglou@programming.dev 26 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Exactly this, the cables never mattered. They're the least significant part of an audiophile system and I doubt anyone could tell the difference between a crappy cable and a good quality cable. People get good quality cable for durability rather than sound quality.

[–] thelittleblackbird@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Cable quality only matters in long distances, when the dumping of the signal is noticeable.

If the distance is so short that there is not any voltage drop and still out powering the external noise. There is in effect no influence

[–] iglou@programming.dev 2 points 6 hours ago

Oh yeah, for sure. I didn't include that part because an audiophile setup rarely has a need for long distances.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I think the term audiophile has changed in the last decade or two, because now i keep seeing being used to mean “someone who likes music more than the average person”. Before it was more “had an entire room dedicated to music listening and if you move their chair a millimetre they will literally murder you”

That’s the kind of person who swears that can tell s huge difference based on cable (but, of course, never in a blind test).

There are websites dedicated to selling them things they don’t need. A 1m audio cable can cost several tens of thousands of pounds/dollars. And they’ll buy them and swear that they make a significant difference to the timbre of the hi hats on track 3 of The Joshua Tree

Think I’m exaggerating? Here’s a cable, for home use. 8ft. Yours for the low, low price of £98,770

That’s not a pair, btw…

[–] iglou@programming.dev 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I do mean "person with a huge setup dedicated to music listening". An audiophile who actually knows what they're talking about will tell you to get any cable from a reputable brand.

But of course you also have "audiophiles" who have no idea whatsoever.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

As long as its not too crappy. Otherwise you’ll wonder why you’re picking up radio.

[–] Lawnman23@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

I’ve literally used lamp wire in a pinch before…sounded great 😆

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Even more than the actual contact with the media, the entire system breaks down at the ears. If your ears aren't well-trained, then you don't even know what to listen for. You might think loud bass is good, or booming drums, and never notice that you can't hear any mids.

So in a blind test like this, some people just might prefer a sound that this experiment has little impact on, so they wouldn't be able to notice any differences.

A well-trained ear might be able to detect differences between them, but still not have a real preference. Besides being able to hear all the different frequencies, you have to know what the instruments sound like in real life to know if those frequencies are reproducing accurately. Again, if you don't what it's supposed to sound like, you really don't know if ANY change in components makes a positive or negative difference in the natural sound, you only know the difference relative to your personal preference.

TL;DR: This "experiment" doesn't prove anything. It's just funny.

[–] vacuumflower 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yes, so my well-trained ears prefer noisy sound, something like 48kb mp3s I downloaded from the web in my childhood (born 1996). Because that's less likely to cause migraine through them than a good record with some annoying sounds in it, preserved by a more precise lossy encoding. And things you want to hear are kept well enough even by 48kbit mp3s.

And this surprisingly keeps with analog things, like headphones and speakers. I prefer something cheap and noisy that makes sounds softer to something quality and with crisp sound, but somehow too crisp.

And I do have good ears, I can hear a lot of things, a cat walking on a neighboring plot in countryside during wind, things like that. Hence the migraines.

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting, do you know where I can buy a set of trained ears? - Audiophiles, probably.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 14 hours ago

Some of it is genetic, but a lot of it is years of training in hearing and teasing out all the frequencies.

I spent years in the audiophile record business back in the transition days from analogue LPs to digital CDs, and spent a LOT of time with beyond top-of-the-line audio gear, including high end stuff that wasn't even on the consumer market.

My ears got trained from many years in bands and orchestras, then recording sessions, then hearing the final recordings on CD, as well as thousands of other recordings, and many live performances by some of the greatest orchestras in the world. I know what it is supposed to sound like at every stage of the process.

Bottom line, cables aren't going to be a major issue. Guarantee you've got at least 10 other variables making a bigger difference, and most of them can't even be fixed.

[–] Horsecook@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago

Everything you said is wrong.

Only noticing the distortion you care about is fine. If you don’t notice it, it is necessarily irrelevant. You are not a computer, analog audio signals are not a digital transmission of data, where errors make the data unreadable.

An original recording was provided. The re-recordings are supposed to sound like the original. They’re not testing microphones, or whatever processing the audio engineer did, the sound of the original instruments is irrelevant.

[–] AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Speakers are made of wood, the good ones are at least.

Unless your referring to the actual drivers, then yeah wood wouldn't really work in that case.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, i meant the cone, not the case

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Solid natural wood is a horrible material for loudspeaker cabinets. Granted, this fact isn't limited to just speakers. Wood expands and contracts with humidity, which means making boxes of any type out of solid wood complicated. Cabinet doors have floating panels in the center for exactly this reason. That's why you should use breadboard ends if you want to frame a wood table, otherwise your table will risk warping and cracking. There's also the whole non-uniform density thing. Most loudspeakers use something like MDF as a substrate and will veneer the outside. MDF is both stable and uniformly dense, which makes achieving a "dead" (or non-resonate) enclosure a lot easier.

[–] AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 13 hours ago

Yes you're 100% right. Solid wood will warp and split, I did mean MDF and should have said as such

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

Well, paper is a very popular material in speaker cones, including high-end

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Cables give resistance... thats all...

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 1 points 15 hours ago

I heard one guy talk about the importance of cable shielding and connector material and shit once, but the ones I actually know just talk about the other hardware (speakers, mixing pults, lots of terms I couldn't recite).