Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
If you approve someone, you don't need to explain yourself, you would just say "I agree with this guy". There's no substance to it.
However, if you downvote, you are saying "this is wrong". Which is much different. When you accuse someone of being wrong, you should explain yourself, otherwise you're being a dick.
It's fine if someone already answered with what you were going to answer. You can just upvote that guy and move on.
EDIT: I'm absolutely in awe that this comment specifically gathered so many downvotes. And this is a good example of what I was referring to. Lots of people downvoted, and 0 ppl said why.
I didn't downvote your comment, but I'll explain why I don't agree with it.
We should upvote and downvote based on whether a comment contributes or doesn't contribute to the discussion. If I disagree with a comment but still find it thought provoking or worth reading, then I'll probably upvote. If I agree with a comment that adds nothing worthwhile to the discussion then I won't upvote and might even downvote. If a comment adds no value to the discussion then there's nothing to be gained by replying to it.
Because they don't have the intellectual capacity and/or the courage to engage with what you've said in earnest, since it might mean they'd have to agree with you and admit they were wrong (and these are not wise people who understand admitting you're wrong is the path to being right). They'd rather just "e-boo" you without any more explanation and hope the other stupid cowards do the same and there we go, we were right all along because of numbers! Morons, lol, spineless morons.
And the downvotes on the post I'm replying to just gives what I've said here more credence, lol.
I agree. Unexplained downvotes on posts that look like they're in good faith weaken the platform - it's slapping someone who spent time and effort writing their idea.
I've heard of other systems that require a reason (or comment) to go along with a downvote. That seems like a good approach.