this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
1204 points (98.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

10964 readers
2737 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 17 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

So you got this AND bombs for Israel

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, we did, and the people who purposefully threw the election rather than compromise one bit with what the people wanted are responsible.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

And yet we are the ones to suffer the consequences. Who cares who's "responsible"? What matters is who is affected.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Because if you want anything to change, the pressure has got to be applied in the right direction. If people just keep blaming their neighbours, of course no politician will ever feel like they have to do anything to improve things.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If you want anything to change, you need to take effective actions. The consequence politicians face by taking ineffective actions is maybe not winning their race. The consequence our neighbors face by taking ineffective actions is the erosion of their civil rights.

If you actually want to pressure politicians, you do it by contacting them directly to inform them of their failings, they're not just going to magically know why you didn't vote or vote third party.

Protest voting doesn't apply the pressure you think it does.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

If you actually want to pressure politicians, you do it by contacting them directly to inform them of their failings

Sure, that's a thing you should do

they're not just going to magically know why you didn't vote or vote third party

They actually expend substantial effort and sums of money to find this out, there's nothing magical about it.

Protest voting doesn't apply the pressure you think it does.

On the other hand, voting for them anyway if they do something absolutely abhorrent and beyond any kind of humanity tells them they can get away with anything and is just a race to the bottom.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 minutes ago

They actually expend substantial effort and sums of money to find this out

And yet here we are, so clearly they're either drawing the wrong conclusions or they just don't care. Either way, it's not an effective strategy.

voting for them anyway if they do something absolutely abhorrent and beyond any kind of humanity tells them they can get away with anything and is just a race to the bottom.

Elections don't care about nominal votes, they only care about margins. Candidates don't get any extra powers if they win by 1 vote or 1 million. The race is taking place with or without you. You can help the ones moving slower, or resign yourself and your neighbors to the ones moving faster. But protest voting doesn't stop the race.

Write your representatives, protest, build dual power, organize your community, engage in direct action, run for local office; these are all productive strategies. Vote for ideal candidates in primaries. But in the actual election, vote strategically against the most abhorrent and least humane candidate, or you're liable to get them.

[–] jaennaet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

But hey, at least they didn't get Kamala Harris, who would somehow been worse than literal fascism

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

"You must accept this boot to the neck or we let the crazy guy shoot you," isn't the slam dunk argument you think it is.