Anyone who is found to be in possession of incest pornography could face a maximum sentence of two years in prison, while anyone found to be publishing it could face five years behind bars.

Guess how many people who are caught in possession of it are going to get prosecuted versus the number of gigantic porn sites and studios that make stupid amounts of money over distributing it. Also, like CSAM, watching it on a browser through one of those distributors could technically count as "possession". The fact that they're focusing so much on the "prison" punishment rather than fines or service takedowns means they're not even pretending to go after producers.

I'd also like to read some actual sources with regards to the relation of consumption of pornographic simulations of incest and actual real life abuse. I have no strong opinion either way, but the position there seems a bit "it is known". The porn industry itself, on the other hand, is filled to the brim with very well documented abuse no matter how much the big sites pinkwash it. I suppose Labour doesn't care about workers, what a surprise.

While a complete porn ban is unlikely to ever come to light, especially considering LADbible's 'For F**k's Sake' campaign found that 77 per cent of Gen Z people admit to watching it, the current government is committed to ensuring it is as safe as possible.

Ah, yes, safe pornography. \s

Meanwhile, Musk's little mechahitler chatbot is still out there helping brits to make nonconsensual porn. Just block the mechahitler website, you cowards.