Only the royals are allowed to enjoy incest
this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
55 points (100.0% liked)
politics
22996 readers
87 users here now
Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.
Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.
Take any slop posts to the slop trough
Main is good for shitposting.
Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.
Off topic posts will be removed.
Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
ugh... what are you DOING, step-government
Oi, Step-bruv, you got a loicense for helpin' me out a' the dryah?
Big brother is watching
Oi you got a wanking loicense for that 
Ofcom has said there is no way to stop Brits from using virtual private networks (VPNs) to dodge the age checks.
With a VPN, you can access parts of the internet which might be blocked in your region, as the service 'masks your IP address, and lets you sidestep website blocks and firewalls on the internet', according to Microsoft.
According to the BBC, Ofcom has said that platforms must not host, share or permit content encouraging the use of VPNs.
Speaking to the outlet, the government has also said that under the Online Safety Act, it will be illegal for sites to do this.
Final goal of course is to ban VPNs, something they coded as authoritarian because they said China does it (they do not) so they have to invent a reality in which VPNs somehow terrorize kids.
Half of YouTube content and podcasts must be banned for having a nordvpn sponsorship
People.who feel sad about it will now get to see more betterhelp sponsorships. Capitalism breeds solutions.
Crusader Kings Enjoyers: 
Utterly pointless. This entire genre of porn exists as a replacement for pizza guy or delivery person porn. It is just a story gimmick to explain why the 2 people in the scene are at the same house and because having an imaginary hot step-sibling is easier for more people to imagine than having a delivery job.
I want to know who is putting the labour party up to this because it's really quite ridiculous.
I think theres more to it, its all about dudes getting laid and "being taken care of" with absolute zero (even minus) effort, thats not really a thing in delivery person porn.
Well yeah because the delivery person is the dude in those. In this version the dude doesn't do anything except get out of bed and not even that in some cases.
that might be sociologically correct but we need a genre shift off that shit
We don't need anything if it's not actually harmful in any measurable way. I've seen no evidence of such. If I see actual evidence of that then sure, but I otherwise side with not policing any of this stuff on the basis of it making some people uncomfortable because there's a lot of other things that I don't want laws against for the same reason.
but have you considered that i personally dislike it?
Anyone who is found to be in possession of incest pornography could face a maximum sentence of two years in prison, while anyone found to be publishing it could face five years behind bars.
Guess how many people who are caught in possession of it are going to get prosecuted versus the number of gigantic porn sites and studios that make stupid amounts of money over distributing it. Also, like CSAM, watching it on a browser through one of those distributors could technically count as "possession". The fact that they're focusing so much on the "prison" punishment rather than fines or service takedowns means they're not even pretending to go after producers.
I'd also like to read some actual sources with regards to the relation of consumption of pornographic simulations of incest and actual real life abuse. I have no strong opinion either way, but the position there seems a bit "it is known". The porn industry itself, on the other hand, is filled to the brim with very well documented abuse no matter how much the big sites pinkwash it. I suppose Labour doesn't care about workers, what a surprise.
While a complete porn ban is unlikely to ever come to light, especially considering LADbible's 'For F**k's Sake' campaign found that 77 per cent of Gen Z people admit to watching it, the current government is committed to ensuring it is as safe as possible.
Ah, yes, safe pornography. \s
Meanwhile, Musk's little mechahitler chatbot is still out there helping brits to make nonconsensual porn. Just block the mechahitler website, you cowards.
UK is really focusing hard on porn lately. I guess better to focus on that and trans issues then actually helping people.
I bet birth control is next. They need us to pump out lots of new workers to keep the machine running. I'm beginning to think refusing to reproduce is one of the most radical acts we can take.
they're just mad it's fake incest
"Unsafe online videos" unsafe for who
Not even going for the “teen” category?
They don't want to ban their favorite category
Oi, wut now? We can't havuh roit wank to abit a noncery flic of me step-sisso? This is roit un-bri-ish it is, God save teh King, we gon run outta royals if we don git this fixed sooone!!