this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
327 points (98.2% liked)

Share Funny Videos, Images, Memes, Quotes and more

3176 readers
623 users here now

#funny

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 32 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

How is it “worth” any more than 0?

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 22 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Really. The entire concept is so fundamentally stupid that you’d have to be even stupider to fall for it. Turns out, there are plenty of people who are.

[–] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Why? How is it stupid to store a hash of something on a distributed ledger?

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The concept of a shared cache layer that uses cryptographic hashes to distribute copies to everyone that request them isn't stupid at all. In fact that is how CDNs work and they are extremely useful. The stupid part is paying large sums of money to "own" a specific sequence of bits on a specific ledger. The ledger can be copied and is copied, but you have zero ownership of those copies and you don't own the original work either. So what did you pay for?

[–] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago

The ability for a 3rd party consensus of truth against an immutable ledger. Without it, the 3rd party has to keep their own copy or federate with an original authority. The fact nft still needs consensus of truth is only somewhat problematic. Blockchain solves ownership through secrets, but a coin or nft is only worth something if someone else cares about that ownership and agrees that ledger is valid. 1 bitcoin is not 1 dogecoin for the same reason I wouldn't buy a monkey picture for a million dollars, but that same million dollar monkey picture gets you into a yacht party with someone else. Ultimately you paid for dispute resolution by a 3rd party for some kind of use of that nft. If there is no use, then you paid for nothing.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's worth whatever someone else is willing to pay for it.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, I understand capitalism. My question stands.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

That's the answer to the question. It's unsatisfying I know, but that's the answer.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Your comment tells us the definition of "worth". It doesn't tell us why someone is willing to pay that much for it, which is what bag-o-chips is asking about.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

It doesn't matter, that's the answer. You can be unsatisfied all you want, that's the answer.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

they're successful attempst by the ultra rich to hide their money while getting more from everyone else.