this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
392 points (99.5% liked)

politics

28779 readers
2820 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Chuck Schumer is not only failing to meet the moment by not opposing the war on Iran. He has long been a hawk on Iran among Democrats and Americans who are yearning for peace.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 8 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

No, unfortunately for him and his family, I do not think he will be forgotten at all. People will remember who was in power who could have stopped this, they will burn it into their memories like a brand so they never forget. I know I already have.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 8 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

And those people will die in a few more decades, and he will be forgotten. Regulated to the most obscure history books

Even kids today know jack shit about 9/11, nor do they care. You would be hard pressed to find anyone who could name the minority leadership under Bush Jr and who supported the AUMF or Patriot Act.

History will forget Schumer, Trump will take up most of all anyone ever learns of this era.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Exactly. I lived through the Iran/Contra affair, and I don't remember most of the players in a scandal that was way worse than Watergate.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

I disagree, no generation will be able to do more damage to the earth than the Boomer generation, this period of time will be remembered and talked about in stories, history and parables for hundreds if not thousands of years. The damage is that acute that is being locked in right now, so no, I think people will be VERY interested in the villains, especially the "quiet" ones from this period, in the same way people are interested in the ways in which the Roman Empire could have avoided collapse to some degree but did not.

Trump is in many ways a boring character, he is easy to diagnose, he telegraphs his intentions with everything he does and projects every internal insecurity he has on to his enemies. There is nothing to discover, nothing creative to Trump's bigotry and fascism. There are no cliffhangers to the story of Trump, no interesting twists or turns, it is all just a base reduction, a cynical exclusion of all else but a worship of might makes right and narcissism.

People will be far more interested in the ways in which the DNC and Democratic Leadership made the catastrophe of fascism inevitable in their failures to meet the reality of the moment or pass even marginal reforms to improve the quality of life of people in the US.

There is little to learn peering into a figure like Trump, but Biden, Schumer, Jeffries.... Nancy Pelosi... those characters are much more historically relevant because they occupied positions that could have ostensibly headed off the descent to fascism in a way that would have been massively popular with the general public, the question of why they didn't is far more fruitful for historians than why did Trump start another dumb as fuck war.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I am looking forward to an episode of HardThrasher, 30 years from now. The Internet Historian, too. This era of politics will be evergreen for video historians, simply because there is so much bullshit to unpack.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

no generation will be able to do more damage to the earth than the Boomer generation

I highly doubt that. It seems younger generations have learned neither the lessons of vaccination nor the lessons of fascism from WWII.

If that Fourth Turning thing turns out to be right - and Zeus help us if it does, the boomer generation will be viewed as a Renaissance era (and a lot of what they worked for was - all kinds of awakening happened thanks to them, regardless of the current en vogue narratives).

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

If that Fourth Turning thing turns out to be right - and Zeus help us if it does, the boomer generation will be viewed as a Renaissance era

Ahahahahaha

I highly doubt that. It seems younger generations have learned neither the lessons of vaccination nor the lessons of fascism from WWII.

The damage is already locked in, to do a greater amount is impossible, for in the wake of the damage Boomers have witnessed in their lives there will be far less left to destroy.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Shrug, you can laugh I guess? Even if it's quite en vogue at the moment to lay all the problems at the feet of one generation, I think it's incredibly simplistic and naive to do so. Especially when we can see an incredible rise in younger men embracing the tenets of fascism right now, and they are nowhere near the age of boomers.

This is the boomers we are talking about, and they contain multitudes. They fought for gay rights, they fought for civil rights, they fought for women's rights. Prior to the boomers, women could not even have a bank account without a man in their life signing off on it.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

with respect, who was in power that could have stopped hitler?

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Who could have stopped Hitler?

All of Von Hindenbergs supporters, who were pulling every dirty trick they could think of against the leftist candidate. Sound familiar?

Hindenbergs son ran his campaign and gave all his speeches as hindenberg was too old and feeble to do it himself. Hindenberg didnt even last two years into his term before dying, which paved the way for hitler to merge the presidency and chancellory.

Hindenberg appointed Hitler chancellor-- supposedly the geriatric idiot Von Hindenberg didnt even recognize Hitler when he appointed him and mistook him for the old Kaiser. All those people who supported hindenberg screwed the entire world. Exactly the same as all the Dem centrist idiots supporting Biden when he was drooling on himself did, while they said Biden was as sharp as ever. And the centrist dem idiots still havent learned their lesson. Biden is a shockingly close parallel to Hindenberg. And the centrists are idiot Von Hindenbergs idiot supporters. And we are all watching the world burn again, as if history is replaying itself almost exactly, with hitler played by trump.