this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
503 points (98.6% liked)

News

36457 readers
3767 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 126 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (5 children)

Wright posted that "the US Navy successfully escorted an oil tanker through the Strait of Hormuz to ensure oil remains flowing to global markets," crediting President Donald Trump with "maintaining stability of global energy during the military operations against Iran."

Within hours, a senior source in the IRGC's naval force told Iranian outlet Iran Now that the claim "has no basis in truth," insisting that no US-escorted tanker had transited the strait.

The source described the announcement as part of a "media war and attempts to mislead public opinion," adding that the strait remains under "precise surveillance" by Iranian forces and that "any military movement in the area is fully monitored."

Wright subsequently deleted the post without public explanation, undermining a week of administration messaging aimed at convincing the world that commercial traffic would soon resume.

For an administration that relies so heavily on propaganda lies, they are remarkably terrible at lying.

In any case, even if it were true and not a pathetic lie, Donald Trump would deserve no credit for slightly mitigating the problems Donald Trump caused when Donald Trump decided to start bombing Iran and slaughtering its civilians.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 63 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

The trick is the people they’re lying to won’t look past the surface, so the lie does not have to be good.

[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 43 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I used to work for Anthroplogie (kinda bougie clothing store). We sold bound copies of On Bullshit, marketed largely because the title is funny and would look good on a coffee table. One day, while it was slow, I started reading it. In case folks don't know, it's actually a guy's doctoral thesis for his philosophy degree and aims to establish "bullshit" as a philosophical category. It's brilliant and completely changed the way I see things.

See, philosophy is battle between truth and falsehood. The author argues that bullshit is a greater threat to truth than a lie. This is because a lie needs the truth in order to be effective, whereas bullshit does not care one way or another. What we're seeing now is not the US government lying to people. It's the US government spouting bullshit. So yeah, they don't care if the lie is good. Because they're not lying. They're bullshitting.

EDIT: Apparently there are now two books with that title! The one of which I'm referring is by Harry Frankfurt (and is available online as a PDF if I'm not mistaken).

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

So there is apparently two different books titled that. Is it the Harry Frankfurt one?

[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 9 points 16 hours ago

Ah, yes. That one.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

Some people just want to believe I guess. Like they could start pushing lies that trump cured cancer and there would be some people that believed it with no credible evidence even as they died from cancer. The media would spin words to make it not sound like complete fabrication but rather everyone being misdiagnosed, and then appease some moderates by stating cancers are all different issues really, so they don't really have cancer but a more acutely defined illness and at the end of the day 30% of Americans would answer polls that Trump cured cancer, 30% say he didn't cure cancer and 40% didn't know how they felt or if their head was infact in their ass at that very moment. Because yes, several of them look around and only see shit.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

They have always been bad at lying. Every lie this administration tells is obviously transparent, if they were good enough to concoct a reasonable lie they would be intelligent enough to not get involved in a war with an oil producing country without first restocking their oil reserves. No one this administration has any brains at all.

[–] madde@feddit.org 15 points 15 hours ago

the timeline in which the IGRC's public statement are more trustworthy than US officials...

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 20 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

At a certain point the propaganda stops making any sense on purpose. It's not designed to deceive. It's used to identify resistance.

[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 11 points 17 hours ago

"Flood the zone with shit" means it's more important to many lies fast than to tell any lies well.