Apple

20319 readers

6 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:

No NSFW Content
No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
No Ads / Spamming
Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

MichelleG@lemmy.world

RoyalEngineering@lemmy.world

thisisdee@lemmy.world

MacBook Neo review: Apple puts every $600 Windows PC to shame (www.engadget.com)

submitted 3 days ago by cantankerous_cashew@lemmy.world to c/apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] fourish@lemmy.world -8 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Not really any point. Mac OS takes all of the best parts of a Unix OS and wraps them in the only GUI interface that truly doesn’t suck.

[–] nobody_1677@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

MacOS is UNIX, but is not the best implementation of UNIX.

The UNIX tools it ships are extremely old. For example, it comes with GNU Screen, which I was using but was having same strange issues with. It turned out it uses a version from 2006... so I had to brew install a modern version.

And I'm personally not the biggest fan of MacOS. It's certainly better than Windows thanks to Apple mostly treating the user with basic respect (no ads), but the desktop/window manager is just super quirky. No other desktop, whether it be Windows or any desktop on Linux behaves quite like it. They tend to only adopt the nicer features while keeping a UX that feels closer to Windows. For example, MacOS quirky/unique in doing

Requiring a click to activate a window (with no option to change this behavior)
Fullscreening a window moves it to its own space
Closing an app's window does not close the app itself for the majority of apps
- Perhaps not the biggest deal if the goal is app startup speed for heavily used apps, but unnecessary for rarely used apps and clutters the dock)
- Also can be quite annoying since it will drag you to the last space you used the app on
Minimized windows show on dock as previews
- Not that of an idea, but strange since you now have two ways to bring the app back: clicking on the app icon itself or the minimized preview

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I have lots of problems with the GUI from a productivity standpoint. Its situational for many people. The problem with MacOS is, like windows, you have very few options to change it.

I would like to see a dock that does not dynamically asjust the position of icons. Fix the positions for muscle memory.

The app switching logic should be switching between windows not apps.

It needs proper tiling and snapping support.

The common UI elements forced on apps take up too much screen space.

Its not that any other OS is inheritly better, its that MacOS is more locked down in terms of the ability to adjust or improve it.

[–] detren@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Honestly compared to windows it’s a lot more customisable. There’s a vibrant community of developers that make really great apps for macOS, and nowadays a lot of it is foss too. I just recently installed DockDoor, which enables your desired windows not app switching and A LOT more. There’s another app that adds basically hyprland style window management, and there are other alternatives as well, like rectangle, or Loop, which add more normal window snapping.

Also I don’t know if it’s a setting I changed but I don’t have dynamically adjusting icon positions. It behaves the same way as windows.

Overall imo there’s a ton more easy customisation compared to windows, and a lot of it adds big new features in my experience. Of course it doesn’t compare to Linux, but it’s a lot better than windows.

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

Thanks for the tips. Will look into it.

[–] vandsjov@feddit.dk 1 points 3 days ago

Agree, many more options on Mac than on Windows. However, the Windows way of handling apps/windows is much better by default. Might be 30+ years of Windows use but most other DEs work the same way - just macOS and GNOME (of the majors) that works differently (of the ones I’ve used).

[–] qupada@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago

That's a big part of the problem though... it's Unix. The BSD-based underpinnings of Mac OS are just different enough to be a colossal pain in the arse for interoperability with GNU-based systems.

At a surface level things seem similar enough, but that people seem to think developing on Mac and deploying on Linux is this simple process really confuses me, because every time it's come up in my career nothing has ever worked properly. Every occasion a bunch of time wasted finding the one little difference that breaks on one platform (and I'm going to be blunt here; it was always on the Mac).

For my money too, the Mac UI features some of the most incomprehensible and borderline unpleasant design decisions. Window management is downright infuriating. File management feels barely functional. Apple's stubborn insistence in hiding the options they'd clearly prefer you didn't use (to make using it actually pleasant) in "accessibility" menus is baffling.

Some of this stuff harks back to last century. I hated the way things worked back then in Mac OS 6 on a Mac classic, and a lot of it they still haven't fixed.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

what if i want to use all my screen for windowed app

[–] detren@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

Turn on Hide Dock in settings.