this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
325 points (99.4% liked)

World News

54680 readers
2848 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (6 children)

So this makes me think. Did they attack Venezuela first to get access to the oil there and prevent a price spike from happening when they attacked Iran? Or am I giving the current regime too much credit?

[–] JollyG@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Considering that representatives from the Trump cabinet appeared to be surprised that Iran can and did block the strait of Hormuz, I'd say you are giving too much credit.

Also, the US is a net exporter of oil. National supply concerns aren't the issue so much as global supply shock. Restrictions anywhere lead to price hikes.

[–] jellyfishhunter@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Wasn't the Venezuela oil basically worthless because proper extraction would be too expensive to be viable?

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's doubtful if most of the reserves can become viable at any price. (Because the cost of materials increase when oil price increase.) But some are perfectly viable.

But also, even in perfect conditions, if they started drilling right now (what they aren't), it will take several month to start getting any of it.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Not sure if too expensive but the geopolitical risk is too high.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Same is true of us oil. If you want conspiracy theories, there’s a more straightforward one. Us oil tends to be expensive with the need for advanced drilling such as fracking and horizontal drilling. In order to make a profit, it has to sell at like $60/bbl or more. Raising the global price of oil helps enrich those oligarchs that funded drumps csmpaign

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Well if the price goes up then it becomes feasible to extract it. Same with the oil the US has at home. They could also extract it if the price gets too high, the reason they aren't doing so now is because the Middle East oil is cheaper (well, WAS cheaper).

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago

Too expensive at $60 a barrel. Worth it at $200.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Reminder that literally not one single major oil company wanted to be involved in Trump's plans to exploit Venezuelan oil - with the exception of the one company already there, who basically suggested they might make some very, very small expansions to their operations - because all of them thought it was an idiotic idea.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

trumps purpose in venezuela was justa distraction , just like the attack on iran. hes like the person that chases the next new shiny gold item that comes along.

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Venezuelan oil production fell off a cliff starting around 2015 and has only recovered to a third of what it was then. It will take years to build industry there back up, so it won't do much right now. However, once it is built back up, it will be a major exporter again.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

TBF 2015 is when the US started sanctioning.

[–] hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also when oil prices fell off a cliff

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Additionally, Venezuela's economy went hyper-inflationary at that time too. With three to five digit inflation rates per year. Yes, they had multiple years with five digit inflation rates. Maduro thought this was a great time to print a whole bunch of money!

Then later, in 2023, when the western world is severing their reliance on Russian oil and Venezeula is an obvious choice as a new supplier, Maduro declares he's invading Guyana (their neighboring state with shitloads of oil). Just fucking torpedoes all attempts at improving things for his country.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

venezeuala oil seems very expensive to extract, we havnt heard of venezuela for like 1-2 months already, meaning trump likely has abandoned the country already.