this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
211 points (100.0% liked)

memes

23713 readers
330 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Even that's not gonna be efficient enough for this problem lol. They need like, a continuous supply of barrels, in the region of 1000-3000 per minute, every single minute of the day 24/7.

It's A LOT.

[–] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago

I agree, I was more just riffing on the running joke that liberals will go for all types of ‘futuristic’ transport options, like the hyperloop and boring company, that are essentially worse versions of a train.

[–] YellowParenti@lemmy.wtf 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People underestimate how MUCH oil is used daily. Our strategic oil reserves are ~415 million barrels and we use about 20.6m barrels a day.

The US Strategic Petroleum Reserve, sitting at 415 million barrels going into the crisis, was described by energy analysts at Rapidan Energy as “finite and insufficient to fully offset” the supply gap created by the Hormuz closure. Even at its maximum drawdown rate of 4.4 million barrels per day, the SPR could only cover a fraction of the estimated 11 to 16 million barrels of daily Persian Gulf supply being blocked by the effective closure of the strait.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Even knowing the scale of it I still had to run and re-run the numbers to make sure I wasn't being silly when I said "per minute". No really, it's genuinely that much. It's an absolutely enormous amount that's difficult to appreciate.

[–] casskaydee@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Eh it's only like 20-50 barrels per second