this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
1280 points (91.2% liked)

Political Memes

11448 readers
2911 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hiplobbe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"Both sides are bad" is correct, but perpetuate the notion that you only can vote on the two different parties. There are other parties you can vote on.

"Literally the only way to stay in power", do I need to remind OP that they WON the elections? Democracy goes both ways, your "side" doesn't always win.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

There are other parties you can vote on.

Not in a presidential election. Not if you want your vote to matter at all.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Republicans also really love when you vote third party.

[–] Ravell@lemmy.ml 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Dems/Repubs will happily play hot potato together forever, which they will if there is no third option, which there won't be if we maintain this perspective, and it will all continue dragging itself and all of us further and further right.

Solution is to abolish first-past-the-post first. Not to ignore mathematics and pretend reality does not exist.

Which neither a Dem or Repub will ever allow, and since you are convinced those are currently the only two options, it means they will remain the only two options indefinitely.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 2 points 23 hours ago

Dems/Repubs will happily play hot potato together forever,

Well, yes, there is a perverse incentive here. It sucks.

Basic math and game theory still means that voting third party is self-destructive, in the current US climate.

But I have actually been surprised by how fluid the UK system is right now. They have third parties, in a FPTP system. But the slavish Republicans voters seems to make that not viable in the US.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Only if you were going to vote Democrat.

Republicans hate republican voters going 3rd party.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Which is why the Republicans are directly helping the Green Party. Because every vote for the Green Party is one less vote for Democrats. Should give you a hint about who voting third party helps.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So the title is

Group with GOP ties backs Green Party’s Jill Stein with ads, mail

Seems pretty direct to me, right?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

but they could not work directly with the campaign. Stein had no control over the messaging

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

And what does that difference matter?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 23 hours ago

they weren't directly helping her

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because every vote for the Green Party is one less vote for Democrats

that's not true. many people would vote for a green candidate but would never vote for a war party candidat.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, enjoy your Iran war, after refusing to vote for Kamela Harris. Harris would not have invaded Iran.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 23 hours ago (2 children)
[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

no, it's impossible to prove a nonfactual

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Do you say that to the people who are saying Harris would have done the same things that Trump is doing, or is that only a response to people saying it’s blatantly fucking obvious that she wouldn’t? Sounds like cope to me.

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

we can't know what would have happened if she had won because she didn't win.

I don't see anyone saying she would have invaded iran, though, so I've never had the opportunity to educate such a person on the unprovableness of nonfactuals

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

We can.

We can know that she wouldn’t have the same administration who have been doing this shit. You can make some logical deductions that if we didn’t have Hegseth and the heritage foundation pulling all the strings with no consequences for their actions that things would, inarguably, not be happening as they are now. We can be sure the Venezuela and Cuba shit wouldn’t be happening. There are plenty of things that we absolutely can guarantee would not be happening, it just requires you to pull your head out of your ass.

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

this does not give us access to an alternate reality in which kamal won. it's just storytelling. there is no evidence for it because there can be no evidence for it.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 43 minutes ago)

It’s not about getting a wish, it’s about establishing accountability for actions and faulty reasoning. You are why we are here. Do better next time, if there is one.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Trump apparently took the decision to go to war against Iran ignorant of the Iranian threat to close the Hormuz straight. Even I knew Iran would do that.

The whole reason to go to war with Iran was to stop the Iranian nuclear program... which Trump himself cancelled Obama's deal to stop.

Harris would not have been Bibi's little bitch.

There is no reason to think that Harris would have gone to war with Iran.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 23 hours ago

this isn't proof. it's story telling

[–] Hiplobbe@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A democracy should be about voting for what you believe is the best course of action, and not to meta game the system. The system breaks when people think like this "if I don't vote for the other option my vote doesn't count".

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 3 points 1 day ago

Solution is to abolish first-past-the-post first. Not to ignore mathematics and pretend reality does not exist.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A democracy should be about voting for what you believe is the best course of action

Sup? I'm here to remind you that you don't live in a perfect reality and never will.

It doesn't matter what SHOULD be. It matters what IS.

If you want to vote 3rd party in local/state elections to try to help build their influence and get more than ZERO of their members in Congress, that's great. But if you vote 3rd party in a presidential election when a 3rd party stands exactly NO chance of winning, then you are a fool who is throwing your vote away and acknowledging that you're fine with the worst case scenario happening.

To be clear, the 3rd party candidate with the most votes in the 2024 presidential election only got 0.5% of the total votes cast. Proving that there is no reality in which a 3rd party candidate wins the presidency.

I could have voted for Jeff Goldblum for president, cuz I think he's a cool guy. But that would have been pretty stupid, wouldn't it?

[–] Hiplobbe@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Exactly, that mentality is where democracy fails. You no longer vote for what you believe, you instead vote for what you think will win.