this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
942 points (95.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

11199 readers
2486 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Naich@piefed.world 114 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Note that the person criticising the original is also not active in organising a general strike. It is permissable to hold opinions without being obliged to act on them.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes. But the moment you release your opinion out on the wild, we're allowed to ridicule you for them.

[–] Naich@piefed.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course you can. I'm just saying that the criticism is stupid in this case. I mean, I think that fusion power would be a good thing, but fuck me for not working 24 hours a day on a PhD in nuclear physics.

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But that's more like having people talk about how we should do nuclear and renewable power, and you coming along complaining people should be working on developing fusion power instead because fission power just won't do anything

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not it isn't.

Arguing that fission power won't do anything is objectively incorrect.

Arguing that a general strike would be more effective than weekend rallies alone is objectively correct.

Your analogy is not analagous.

Beyond that, arguing against doing something is not the same as arguing for doing something else, in addition to /or/ instead of the original something.

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Arguing that fission power won't do anything is objectively incorrect.

That's an opinion, regardless of whether it's true or not. The analogy is analogous because I'm taking the same actions and statements, applying them to analogous topics in a different field. Dismissing that because you believe your beliefs to be objective fact is just dishonest.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

... Fission power works.

It generates energy.

This is objectively true.

That is not nothing.

If you were being hyperbolic, well then your analogy is not analagous because one end of it is hyperbolic.

[–] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That is true, however this is not about the acting, it's about hypocrisy in the traditional sense. OC is essentially saying "we have the same goal and I set an easier plan and I'm currently following it, while you are criticizing my plan, making up a way harder one, saying I should follow that one while not following either mine or your plan at all."

It's like when you are working in a supermarket, restocking the shelves and your coworker is just sitting on a chair watching you, and after a while he says "this is useless, you should rather do some cashier work, people are waiting" while eating candy.

Yeah sure he might be technically right, but this is extremely out of line.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why should I listen to you? You're not actively involved in organizing a general strike either.

You've opened this Pandora's Box my friend there's no closing it again now. It's not being actively involved in organizing a general strike all the way down.

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

Yeah if you’re not actively involved in organizing a general strike you don’t get my vote. And since there are not any candidates meeting that criteria, I’m staying home on Election Day.

Don’t believe me? There’s 10 of millions of US citizens who will be doing the same thing!

Checkmate /s

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 day ago

Yea I’m really bad at organizing but I damn well know it has to be done by someone with the skill to do it.

[–] SooperGoose@thelemmy.club 0 points 20 hours ago

I disagree about it being permissable. If anything it makes you a hypocrite and undermines the appearance of intelligence and empathy, alike. The complaint is also misguided and simply wrong. Saying nothing will change is absurd. Things are already changing. These rallies raise awareness for everyone. You can't have a general strike until you get everyone to agree to it.