this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
474 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

83264 readers
4865 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The vast data centers that power artificial intelligence are so energy hungry that they’re heating up their surroundings, according to new research. It’s an alarming finding given the number of data centers is predicted to explode over the next few years.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 83 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Years ago, I was driving through NY city-ish. We pulled over in a rest area and I saw a sign about turning your engine off. I thought it was the stupidest thing I had ever seen, as did many other people apparently as their cars were idling. Then I got out of my car. I was wrong. The heat was insane. I couldn’t wrap my little head around it. I started doing the engineer math thing because it didn’t make sense.

Doesn’t surprise me at all these massive data centers are creating little heat domes. The cars were bad enough, and they are a fraction of the energy.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 52 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

100% of electricity burned turns to heat save light that leaves earth. Gigawatt data center? That's ~650,000 1500w space heaters.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 57 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

i work for a large power company, we have a data center customer that have as many equally sized cooling towers as one of our nuclear power plants.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 21 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

Pretty soon you’ll just have nuclear plants just to power data centers.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

You'll need the same number of cooling towers for the computers too. All the energy created by the reactor will turn into heat, essentially doubling the amount of cooling needed.

[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 18 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't Microsoft try to pay for a nuclear plant to be recommissioned just to power a data centre or something?

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

There have been several data centers that have bought nuclear plants, including Three Mile Island, they're going to fire that bitch back up, also the Regulators have been disempowered. Propublica on the last part if I recall.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 7 hours ago

something tells me Datancenters power needs will exceed that of old nuclear plants, since they are tyring to expand.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Nuclear plants to power data centers to make ai slop to make more need for data centers to feed us ai ad slop...when does it fucking end?

I hope some vigilantes start taking action against these damn wastes of space.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Have you seen the movie Bugonia? I’m nearly convinced that CEO’s are all human looking aliens that are determined to destroy earth and enslave humans. #tinfoilhat #downtherabbithole

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

The disease is late stage capitalism, the symptom is a mad dash to trade our natural resources for energy and pollution. The mad dash will continue as long as we're bleeding humanity to keep the shareholders high and dry.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

Isn't the largest data center currently something like 100MW? So "only" 0.1GW...65.000 space heaters is still insane though.

[–] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

You can have a complex of multiples though and they to congregate near each other for short interconnection.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

we were asked 400MW for a new data center, we told them 100MW is the max we could provide for now, and increase later, we have a new natural gas plant soon to enter operation to replace two retiring coal plants, but looks like we're postponing decommission targets to keep demand

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

I've had a pretty longstanding belief that a lot of the AI push is to inflate energy demand, as we increasingly add more renewables. In order to keep dirty energy "creating revenue" we need an energy sink to offset any added energy. I think this was crypto, and then NFTs. Those both faded away as soon as the AI stuff started being pushed. I don't believe this is totally a coincidence.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 hours ago

The planet is fucked.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That currently exist? I believe Colossus is pushing 150MW and aiming for 300. But Gigawatt centers are on the way

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago

I mean, it's a bit disingenuous to use a GW example in relation to the article, when the largest currently in operation is 0.15GW

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 16 hours ago

Oh. I originally put megawatt and thought that was too small so I just incremented the metric exponent.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

There's 33kWh worth of energy in a gallon of gasoline, and they use 0.3gal/hour when idling, so cars are pumping out 11kWh of heat just sitting there....that's a surprisingly large amount of heat.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

33 kWh/gallon * 0.3 gallon/h = 10 kWh/h = 10 kW

But units aside, that is really nothing. The car itself already has about 3 m² area or about 3 kW of sunlight. The issue is the CO2 (globally) and pollution from the car (locally, causing smog etc.).

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago

I rounded a bit (before I miscalculated), there's 33.7kWh in a gallon and they use 0.35gal/h on average, so they actually use 11.8kWh just idling