this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
550 points (98.1% liked)

News

36915 readers
2741 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

And Chief Justice John Roberts, another conservative on the bench, also had something of a mic-drop moment when Sauer tried to make the point that “we’re in a new world where eight billion people are one plane ride away from having a child who’s a U.S citizen.”

Roberts replied: “It’s a new world. It’s the same Constitution.”

I expect this is where they pivot next. What does it take to amend the American constitution? Or what does it take to make a new one, given that they will try to justify that an old document does not fit the modern world

[–] LadyButterfly@reddthat.com 10 points 19 hours ago

New world same constitution... God they're right. And I totally agree Trump would change it if he possibly could.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It would be impossible in today's political climate.

You need >66% vote in both House and Senate, or you need a Constitutional Convention called by >66% of the state legislatures. Then you need to ratify the amendment, which requires approval by >75% of state legislatures.

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

What could pass 75% of states?

In this day and age it amazes me we ever had that level of consensus. Something is super broken.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 7 points 18 hours ago

Currently 94% of states have medical marijuana yet its still federally illegal and scheduled as a drug with no medical value. That's a good indicator of consensus not meaning jack to the federal government.

[–] sartalon@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago

Same as how they passed prohibition.

It's actually quite fascinating even as it is disconcerting.

They lobbied state by state, and focused on a few key legislators, threatening their seat, until the rest fell in line.

They didn't have to fight them all at once, so they could focus their resources.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 17 hours ago

Its been broken for a while. Just a reminder that the Equal Rights Amendment of 1972 isn't technically implemented because Virginia didn't ratify until 2020 and now there are questions of expired deadlines and recisions.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I hear what you're saying, but have you considered state violence? Quoting legal requirements at this stage seems quaint.

[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

2/3 majority in both chambers of congress, plus ratification by 75% of states.

There is not a single issue that will unify the country to that degree right now.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

It's so wild to think that 8 billion people are just lying in wait, with full wombs, waiting to hop on a plane to have an "anchor baby", all to pull a fast one on white xtian murica.