877
AOC vows to block future US military aid to Israel, its Iron Dome and defense
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
877 points (98.9% liked)
News
36915 readers
3751 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
yes, I agree with this point - maybe not to the point of saying we should dismantle the Iron Dome from protecting civilians, but you are right that the Iron Dome acts as a kind of enabler - providing psychological safety to Israelis that undermines political will to end and avoid conflict.
But I'm not sure the civilians are necessarily the best targets in the first place - there have been massive protests against the current government, and I'm not sure we should really consider Israel a particularly democratic state.
Also, Israel has been genocidal for many decades now, including through decades under which many Israelis had to take cover under bomb shelters, so the Iron Dome is probably not the most relevant factor in whether Israel continues on its path.
I feel that the distinction between then and now is that the first generation of Israelis generally did have a reason to grit it out, a lot of them went through far worse than some bombing raids. But now only the youngest of them remain and even then they're ancient, the majority of modern Israelis would most likely not like having to stick it out in a bunker due to their government being assholes.
But I'll also admit my bias that I don't think Israel should exist, the Arabs should've been allowed to level it decades ago. So my overall prevailing opinion on Israel is a vague sense of fuck it who cares blockade them and let em rot. So my opinion on any interaction with them is pretty much tainted by that constantly, meaning I'd only approve of the Iron Dome if they completely dearmed in totality and even then I may not care.
Point is I don't think the Israelis should be traded with let alone given aid.
I agree the current state of Israel is illegal and shouldn't exist, but political positions like this are separate from my view that most civilians are just normal folks and shouldn't bear the primary burden - generally wars should be fought targeting military targets, not targeting civilians. I understand that's a bit complicated when the conflict is asymmetric and one side is not a military as much as a guerilla resistance, their tactics do rely more on using terror to pressure political solutions in their favor.
But yeah, I agree with not funding Israel ✅ The US doesn't have a special obligation to fund Israel, even if they have been a useful "attack dog" in the Middle East for us, I don't think US intervention in pretty much most cases is helpful - the US is a big part of why Israel gets away with their crimes and is an unchecked genocidal, racist state.
The thing is that the Israelis don't give a fuck about civilians and I am a firm believer in the golden rule even when it does bite me in the ass. So if they don't give a fuck then neither should we, they want to do terroristic bombing campaigns then fine their civilians are valid now as well. You reap what you sow and all that.
But yeah we seem to agree at like 90 percent or so, it's just where we draw the line and what we consider to be morally acceptable. You value civilians and I refuse to due to Israel not valuing them, though I would exterminate every settler community with the vigor of the US army in Vietnam but that's more of a fuck them in particular thing.
You mean the massive protests supporting the right to rape Palestinians?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_hostage_deal_protests
I was talking about the massive protests against the gov't handling of the post-October "war" in favor of a ceasefire and accepting a hostage deal
There are no more hostages being held at this point.
right, these protests happened in the past:
Demonstrating to get hostages back is not the same as demonstrating to stop the genocide.
I don't know what to tell you, being furious with the government and calling for a ceasefire and opening humanitarian corridors doesn't strike me as a citizenry that deserves to be bombed to death. I'm not even sure I feel fully comfortable with the Dresden Fire Bombs, not because I'm sympathetic to Nazism, but because I think civilian targets are not morally defensible targets.
Civilians don't have to be prefect for me to think they shouldn't be military targets.
I'm certainly not advocating that every civilian be bombed to death. But one shouldn't ignore that the overall sentiment in Israel is that they want IDF soldiers to rape Palestinians to death, that they feel entitled to take over Gaza, and that their only care is for their own citizens while they bomb others.
yeah, I do tend to think overall probably a majority of Israeli citizens have problematic views (racism, defending their colonialism, supportive of Israel's war crimes and genocide, etc.) - I just also tend to think civilians are not morally defensible targets and I'm not too keen on defending targeting civilians (even when they're Nazis, as I mentioned earlier).
Osama bin Laden used this kind of logic - that the US is a democracy, and thus civilians are valid targets because unlike in countries where people don't have a choice, the idea is that the government does what the people choose for it to do. And you could make similar claims about US citizens being racist, defending genocide, etc. (after all, we fund, encourage, and enable Israel) ... yet this reasoning still seems wrong to me, esp. when it's a small minority of the US population that ultimately chose the representatives who run the government (and when satisfaction by voters with their representatives is so low, even hitting historic lows).
So, I don't know - this reasoning just doesn't feel entirely right to me, and it's concerning when it's being used to justify indiscriminate bombing of children, women, the elderly, etc.