354
submitted 11 months ago by ZeroCool@feddit.ch to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world 83 points 11 months ago

For context, this all started Thursday when the ADL xeeted that is had a "frank and productive" conversation with X's CEO. She replied with some warm and fuzzy PR bullshit about working together to improve the platform blah blah blah. But the right wing nutjobs weren't happy with the implication that X was in anyway cooperating with the ADL and there was immediate backlash. "Ban the ADL" became a trending hashtag, because, according to the racist majority on X, the ADL is the actual hate group and they pressure advertisers who in turn pressure platforms to "ban free speech." Musk, always quick to undermine the sad sack holding the title "CEO" jumped on that bandwagon and been xeeting about it all weekend, threatening to ban them, generally talking trash, and now threatening to sue.

I find it depressing that I'm aware of all this.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 43 points 11 months ago

they pressure advertisers who in turn pressure platforms to “ban free speech.”

This argument of theirs is so strange. Don't advertisers too have free speech? Is the right wing arguing that advertisers shouldn't be allowed to choose to stop advertising with Twitter? What "pressure" can ADL put on them? Does the ADL have legal authority to force advertisers to exit Twitter? No. Is the ADL holding private information about the CEOs of advertisers and extorting the advertisers to leave? Not likely.

Is the ADL communicating a position that the majority of the advertiser's customers find the racist, fascist, and misogynistic content now omnipresent on Twitter distasteful, and therefore harmful to the advertisers' brands and with negative impacts to future sales? Likely yes, but those statements are themselves free speech on the part of the ADL.

What the right wing seems to be arguing is that the definition of free speech should be the right to say whatever racist, fascist, and misogynistic comments they like without anyone making choices of their own to dissociate with the right wing. That's not free speech that's....fascism!

[-] neptune@dmv.social 7 points 11 months ago

Honestly? Musk might be so used to big business wining in court that he thinks they might just reflexively take his side.

[-] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Perhaps ironically it is the ADLs free speech that allows them to show advertisers what is posted on elons website. Further irony can be found in the fact that a screenshot of elsons website showing bigoted posts is an example of fact and not of feelings. Moreover: crying about your lost ad revenue is feelings and blaming the ADL for it is not facts.

[-] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Don’t advertisers too have free speech?

I remember around 2020, a lot of freethinkers began spouting something about how Twitter is "a platform not a publisher" and therefore users are entitled to treat the website like a public meeting place and protected by first amendment rights, etc.

It was basically a Soverign Citizen argument about how Section 230 means websites don't have the authority to moderate content at all, and it died down after Trump stopped preaching it after he launched Truth

Some articles about the notion:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/04/no-section-230-does-not-require-platforms-be-neutral

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/12/publisher-or-platform-it-doesnt-matter

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I remember around 2020, a lot of freethinkers began spouting something about how Twitter is “a platform not a publisher” and therefore users are entitled to treat the website like a public meeting place and protected by first amendment rights, etc.

I think you're taking that quote of mine with an unintended meaning. I didn't mean to suggest advertisers have right to post what they want, rather they have the choice to NOT post if they don't want to. The right-wing argument appears to suggest that advertisers should be powerless to choose or not choose to advertise. Suggesting they are wheat to be harvested. A resource owned by the company they are purchasing advertising from; its a bizarre notion.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.ml 33 points 11 months ago

It's hard to take that seriously when you use "xeeted".

[-] loobkoob@kbin.social 26 points 11 months ago

The whole website needs to be xeeted out of xistence at this point.

[-] ramble81@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

I call them x-cretions. So you x-crete them.

[-] Slwh47696@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Reminds me of hearing zeeted and zooted all the time on Dota back in the day

[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 19 points 11 months ago

I almost feel bad for the new "CEO". It really seems like she's doing her best to give the impression that Twitter is still a sane company with reasonable business practices, only for Elon to completely disregard her messaging and do the exact opposite.

[-] InvaderDJ@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

I would feel bad if it wasn't obvious that Musk would do this. It is impossible for him to control himself. He can't help to put his dumbass opinion in the mix, no matter how much it hurts him personally and professionally. It's the reason he was forced to buy Twitter in the first place.

[-] overzeetop@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Drop me in her seat for 7 figures with a nice kick-out clause (no stock, please) and I’ll pretend Xitter is a wholesome, thoughtful, productive corporate citizen, too.

[-] InvaderDJ@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

That too. Assuming she is getting paid and not screwed like some of Twitter's former employees, I'm sure she can cry into her pile of money.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 19 points 11 months ago

She's doing exactly what she was hired to do.

[-] markr@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

she's a 'ceo' like the barista at starbucks is a 'manager'.

[-] NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's a shitty position to be in so I almost feel bad as well, except literally everyone knew this was going to happen when she joined. But I doubt she thought, "What's the worst that could happen? I have a bland conversation with the ADL, and Musk spends the weekend retweeting self deacribed antisemites and threatening to ban/sue the ADL?"

She is scheduled to be at the Code Conference hosted by the Verge/Vox at the end of September. I'm really interested in how she answers when asked about being undermined, especially now that the undermining has taken the form of her boss just being an outright antisemite.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

"Look he's not an antisemite, he just thinks antisemitic people should have free speech, but not anyone pointing out that he thinks that"

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

He proved the ADL's point too by unbanning avowed racists she supremacists.

this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
354 points (92.5% liked)

News

22507 readers
3913 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS