877
submitted 11 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 76 points 11 months ago

We toppled Saddam because he wanted to ditch the dollar. I don't think this fuckstick or Elon Marshmallow man have the same level entourage.

All the Russian oligarchs what is like to have all your assets seized, and just me tell ya, Id suffocate from laughter before I ever gave one fuck about the obscenely rich.

I'm ready to Make America Great Again, by taxing any and all assets over 10million, annually, at 75%. The squeaky wheel gets it raised to 85% Back in the oft romanticized golden days the upper tax rate was 90%

Maybe I'm alone in this opinion but I don't think someone should be able to have one idea that sells and then never have to work again. Like, if we all worked 4 hrs a week then fine, but nowadays, with modern tax chattle slavery? Naw man. Edison, Tesla, those guys had to keep inventing. Mr Mypillow can go die under an overpass.

Fuck billionaires. We need a special forces team for the IRS, they can jump from helicopters with their calculator's ribbon.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 23 points 11 months ago

This was gold to read.

I agree. Amassing such volume of wealth that a single individual jas more wealth than many sovereign nations put together is ludicrous.

I'm not against a person making money for their work and ideas but to the point where they can take other companies from business out of spite and mess with the entire economy for sport?

I like to say I don't mind paying taxes. In my country it buys me services and civilization, regardless being far from perfect. If I made a million a year, I could not spend it. I can't imagine what it takes to spend a million.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 19 points 11 months ago

Edison has more in common with billionaires than with inventors.

[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Very true, but the rest of their point is reasonable.

[-] PowerGloveSoBad@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Forget it, he's rolling

[-] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 11 months ago

Can we stop calling russian billionaires "oligarchs" but other billionaires as just "billionaires"? Both are oligarchs.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

We toppled Saddam because he wanted to ditch the dollar

Lmao imagine thinking we went to war in Iraq over Saddam wanting to be poor.

[-] TheWoozy@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I'm unfamiliar with the "tax chattle slavery" concept? What does it mean?

[-] Spendrill@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

tax chattle slavery

I'm guessing the concept is that we are farmed as cattle because we consume and then the money we earn that pays for our food and shelter all gets funnelled upwards to billionaires and as an added bonus we pay taxes to pay for a government which serves the billionaires' interests not ours.

It is notable that we all talk about being part of national economies now whereas we used to talk about being a part of society.

[-] fsr1967@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

It is notable that we all talk about being part of national economies now whereas we used to talk about being a part of society.

This ^

louder for those in the back:

THIS^

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

It doesn't mean anything. It's something white upper middle class kids say when they want to pretend that working for money is at all the same as chattel slavery (he also spelled it wrong), which is how slavery worked in the US.

It's a disgusting turn of phrase that demeans the horrors of actual slavery in the US.

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
877 points (97.7% liked)

News

22488 readers
4289 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS