927
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

WASHINGTON - President Joe Biden will travel to Michigan on Tuesday to join United Auto Workers on the picket line in one of the most extraordinary displays of support a president has ever taken in the middle of a labor dispute.

Biden's trip comes after United Auto Workers President Shawn Fain invited Biden to the picket line in remarks Friday as the UAW ratchets up its strike against the nation's three largest automakers.

"Tuesday, I’ll go to Michigan to join the picket line and stand in solidarity with the men and women of UAW as they fight for a fair share of the value they helped create," Biden said in a statement. "It’s time for a win-win agreement that keeps American auto manufacturing thriving with well-paid UAW jobs."

Further details about Biden's trip, including which striking site he will visit, remain unclear.

Former President Donald Trump, the frontrunner to capture the 2024 Republican nomination, has said he plans to meet with striking auto workers in the Detroit area Wednesday in a push to court rank-and-file union members and other blue-collar workers for his 2024 run.

Biden faced pressure from progressives to join UAW workers on the picket line after Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Sen. Bernie Sanders and others each traveled to striking sites this week.

For the first time Friday, Fain publicly invited Biden to the picket line.

"We invite and encourage everyone who supports our cause to join us on the picket line − from our friends and families, all the way up to the president of the United States," Fain said.

Biden faces a political tightrope with the UAW strike. He has decades of close ties with organized labor and said he wants to be known as the "most pro-union president" in U.S history. But Biden also wants to avoid national economic repercussions that could result from a prolonged strike.

Biden has endorsed UAW's demands for higher pay, saying last week that "record corporate profits, which they have, should be shared by record contracts for the UAW." But at the request of the UAW, Biden has stayed out of negotiations with Ford Motor Co., General Motors and Stellantis.

Fain extended the invitation after announcing plans to expand UAW's strike to 38 new sites across 20 states. He said the union has made good progress with Ford Motor Co. this week, but General Motors and Stellantis "will need some pushing."

White House press secretary Jean-Pierre said the White House "will do everything that we possibly can to help in any way that the parties would like us to."

A White House team led by Acting Labor Secretary Julie Su and White House adviser Gene Sperling was originally scheduled to visit Detroit this week. But the trip was scrapped after UAW's leadership made it clear they did not want help at the negotiating table.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 768@sh.itjust.works 38 points 11 months ago
[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 112 points 11 months ago

You mean when he in the three months afterwards helped the workers and the union to make sure they got their demands, while also not causing an actual rail shutdown that would cause massive harm to multiple areas?

[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 92 points 11 months ago

See if that's true that's sad because that is the best possible outcome and I haven't heard a damn thing about it.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 93 points 11 months ago

Here's about rail: https://www.ibew.org/media-center/Articles/23Daily/2306/230620_IBEWandPaid

Biden seems to do a lot of things that don't get much attention or unfairly get bad attention. For example he drastically reduced number of drone strikes (trump actually increased them after Obama, but blocked reporting).

When he lifted sanctions on NS2 he got a lot of bad flak, some even from democrats. Only months later we learned that Russia was planning attack on Ukraine and he was doing it to repair our relationship with Germany. He managed to persuade them to drop it themselves which is how we supposed to deal with allies.

[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 51 points 11 months ago

“Without making a big show of it, Joe Biden and members of his administration in the Transportation and Labor departments have been working continuously to get guaranteed paid sick days for all railroad workers."

I'm glad yo hear that not everything has to be a show, but this would be a great message to get out to the progressive democrats

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

I'm a bit torn on it. Yes it would be good to publicize, but I really like that he prioritized getting shit done over publicizing it. That's what good leaders should do.

Arguably, this is something that progressive Democrats should be aware of if they truly care about the issue, and aren't just looking for talking points.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

but I really like that he prioritized getting shit done over publicizing it

Why not do both? The executive branch can walk and chew gum.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

I guess it's naive idealism on my part.

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Wow he ended Precision Scheduled Railroading? Didn't hear that /s

He got them some sick days, but definitely not the whole of their demands.

[-] honeynut@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago

Plus the original demand was 15 days of sick leave, and then a tepid 7-day sick leave proposal was sent to die in congress. It's not a miracle that Biden was able to get 5 days. Breaking the strike with state power and then casting crumbs in our direction was a flex on the working class saying "nah you'll only get what we allow you to have. You don't deserve to demand shit."

I'm not holding out any hope that this is anything more than a PR campaign like kneeling cops and kente scarves.

[-] Soulg@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

It's a complete failure of his administration that he said absolutely nothing about this and just allowed everyone to believe that he was against those workers for months.

I found this out a week or so ago and it baffled me that he just said nothing.

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago

It's been a general thing that his administration has just done the positive things without hyping them up or crowing about them on the news.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

He learned nothing from Trump when that's the one lesson Trump should have taught him: Brag.

[-] brlemworld@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I mean... Trump didn't get re-elected. So you could argue that it didn't help.

[-] 768@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

Maybe I'm uninformed, but how are rail strikes, which are common in my country, massive harm that a government of half a continent feels the need to step in?

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 14 points 11 months ago

It was going to be a massive rail strike in a situation where logistics were already strained. The US is run by rail, despite how little we invest into it. It's an absolutely massive amount of land area, and the only reasonable way to transport things across it is rail. It would have crippled almost every business.

That said, if the workers are that important they should get everything they demand. The Biden administration did get them some of their demands, which is better than I expected, they should get more.

[-] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Are you talking about passenger rail strikes or freight? Because in the States, we have no meaningful passenger rail, but our geographical area is SO enormous that freight rail is critical. It makes up like 40% of all freight transport. So shutting the entire thing down would have been more than an inconvenience. It could have cost a lot of other people in other industries their jobs. Also, it could have caused shortages of food, gasoline, chemicals for purifying water, etc.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/looming-rail-strike-would-take-a-major-toll-on-u-s-economy

https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/3644798-how-bad-would-a-rail-strike-have-been/

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

They aren't as common here and this was a rail strike that could prevent the transportation of any number of important things, enough to impact multiple states and millions of people.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Some people like strikebreaking for its own sake and will make up any excuse to do it.

Watch the news for whining about high car prices from people who were fine with high car prices a few weeks ago.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago

As if this thread will let me forget it for 30 seconds.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago

Yep, I'll remember this too.

People are measured by the sum of their actions.

I'm happy this is happening, and was unhappy that went down how it did.

load more comments (32 replies)
this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
927 points (97.6% liked)

politics

18608 readers
3932 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS