927
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

WASHINGTON - President Joe Biden will travel to Michigan on Tuesday to join United Auto Workers on the picket line in one of the most extraordinary displays of support a president has ever taken in the middle of a labor dispute.

Biden's trip comes after United Auto Workers President Shawn Fain invited Biden to the picket line in remarks Friday as the UAW ratchets up its strike against the nation's three largest automakers.

"Tuesday, I’ll go to Michigan to join the picket line and stand in solidarity with the men and women of UAW as they fight for a fair share of the value they helped create," Biden said in a statement. "It’s time for a win-win agreement that keeps American auto manufacturing thriving with well-paid UAW jobs."

Further details about Biden's trip, including which striking site he will visit, remain unclear.

Former President Donald Trump, the frontrunner to capture the 2024 Republican nomination, has said he plans to meet with striking auto workers in the Detroit area Wednesday in a push to court rank-and-file union members and other blue-collar workers for his 2024 run.

Biden faced pressure from progressives to join UAW workers on the picket line after Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Sen. Bernie Sanders and others each traveled to striking sites this week.

For the first time Friday, Fain publicly invited Biden to the picket line.

"We invite and encourage everyone who supports our cause to join us on the picket line − from our friends and families, all the way up to the president of the United States," Fain said.

Biden faces a political tightrope with the UAW strike. He has decades of close ties with organized labor and said he wants to be known as the "most pro-union president" in U.S history. But Biden also wants to avoid national economic repercussions that could result from a prolonged strike.

Biden has endorsed UAW's demands for higher pay, saying last week that "record corporate profits, which they have, should be shared by record contracts for the UAW." But at the request of the UAW, Biden has stayed out of negotiations with Ford Motor Co., General Motors and Stellantis.

Fain extended the invitation after announcing plans to expand UAW's strike to 38 new sites across 20 states. He said the union has made good progress with Ford Motor Co. this week, but General Motors and Stellantis "will need some pushing."

White House press secretary Jean-Pierre said the White House "will do everything that we possibly can to help in any way that the parties would like us to."

A White House team led by Acting Labor Secretary Julie Su and White House adviser Gene Sperling was originally scheduled to visit Detroit this week. But the trip was scrapped after UAW's leadership made it clear they did not want help at the negotiating table.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] foggy@lemmy.world 210 points 9 months ago

As a Democrat who voted for Biden because he didn't want to see fascism, but was very sore about doing so because Biden is a milquetoast moderate at best...

This is sick. Props.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 88 points 9 months ago

He's been a lot more progressive in his policies than I think people thought he'd be. He's not flashy about it though, so people tend to only hear the complaining that comes from much louder people

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
[-] SasquatchBanana@lemmy.world 102 points 9 months ago

I ain't a Joe Biden fanboy, but I would like to say if Bernie got elected president and he did this then the streets would go wild. This is insanely (good) that a president is showing so much solidarity and support to striking workers. This gets eyes and ears about the UAW strike, people see this support, they become emboldened, and now start thinking, "Hey, maybe we should strike or unionize..."

This is such a huge win for America and leftism in general. Let's Go Dark Brandon

[-] underwire212@lemm.ee 26 points 9 months ago

Very true. I see Biden as just another neoliberal capitalist, but tbh this is very good to see. Unions are great for society and the working class, and to see a president openly support this is great to see.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 70 points 9 months ago

Was coming here to complain about this compared to the rail strike - found out that Biden actually got the rail strikers what they wanted in this thread.

Now I've got to complain something else. Hmmm, how about how Biden isn't proud of his union support. Make noise! Show that unions actually work! Stop acting like unions winning is something is something that you should be ashamed of and hide. Good, still got to complain about something.

[-] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 65 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The auto strike has a 75% approval rating. That's way bigger than most things in US politics. Not supporting the auto strike is a losing issue.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] QHC@lemmy.one 53 points 9 months ago

This is great to see!

Biden may not be a progressive as an individual but his administration's agenda is easily the most progressive of my lifetime--and I was old enough to vote for Obama twice. It would be even more so if Congress gave him progressive bills to sign, too!

So far the biggest positive story of 2023 is the massive increase in labor action across multiple industries.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jaschen@lemm.ee 44 points 9 months ago

I feel like I voted for Bernie instead of Biden. Wtf is going on. This is amazing.

[-] drbluefall@toast.ooo 19 points 9 months ago

Perhaps the man's turned a new leaf in his old age. He ain't perfect, sure, but I'd be lying if I said he wasn't far better than I (or most others) had expected.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] 768@sh.itjust.works 38 points 9 months ago
[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 112 points 9 months ago

You mean when he in the three months afterwards helped the workers and the union to make sure they got their demands, while also not causing an actual rail shutdown that would cause massive harm to multiple areas?

[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 92 points 9 months ago

See if that's true that's sad because that is the best possible outcome and I haven't heard a damn thing about it.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 93 points 9 months ago

Here's about rail: https://www.ibew.org/media-center/Articles/23Daily/2306/230620_IBEWandPaid

Biden seems to do a lot of things that don't get much attention or unfairly get bad attention. For example he drastically reduced number of drone strikes (trump actually increased them after Obama, but blocked reporting).

When he lifted sanctions on NS2 he got a lot of bad flak, some even from democrats. Only months later we learned that Russia was planning attack on Ukraine and he was doing it to repair our relationship with Germany. He managed to persuade them to drop it themselves which is how we supposed to deal with allies.

[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 51 points 9 months ago

“Without making a big show of it, Joe Biden and members of his administration in the Transportation and Labor departments have been working continuously to get guaranteed paid sick days for all railroad workers."

I'm glad yo hear that not everything has to be a show, but this would be a great message to get out to the progressive democrats

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 26 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Wow he ended Precision Scheduled Railroading? Didn't hear that /s

He got them some sick days, but definitely not the whole of their demands.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Soulg@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

It's a complete failure of his administration that he said absolutely nothing about this and just allowed everyone to believe that he was against those workers for months.

I found this out a week or so ago and it baffled me that he just said nothing.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (34 replies)
[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago

Labor costs, at roughly 5%, remain a small percentage of annual costs for the Detroit automakers

Source - CNBC and Kristin Dziczek, vice president of industry, labor and economics at The Center for Automotive Research

[-] Sabata11792@kbin.social 28 points 9 months ago

“We invite and encourage everyone who supports our cause to join us on the picket line − from our friends and families, all the way up to the president of the United States,” Fain said.

"Guys, I was being rhetorical, now what are we supposed to do?"

[-] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

A couple of my friends had the president visit the military base they were stationed at. They said it was by far the worst week of their military career. All the security, and the security for the security, and the security theater on top of those so nobody could think they're taking it less than 150% seriously.

And the cleaning. Oh, the cleaning. Basic training has nothing on the minute bullshit "mess" that you can get in trouble for when the president is visiting in 2 days.

load more comments (4 replies)

President Joe Biden has genuinely been one of the more pro-labor presidents in American history. While I strongly disagree with how he handled the rail strikes, the policy coming from his NLRB and the way he's been handling the auto strikes I think are a strong indicator of the policy that he stands for. The United States presidency has an extremely poor track record when it comes to working with labor, and I'll take whatever progress I can get.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

Actually he handled them really well, maybe not so good from the PR point of view, as almost no one reported on it:

https://www.ibew.org/media-center/Articles/23Daily/2306/230620_IBEWandPaid

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

American auto companies: "Fuck."

[-] solstice@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

Didn't biden just sign anti labor legislation to stop the rail worker strike?

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-signs-bill-block-us-railroad-strike-2022-12-02/

Not sure if we should start lining up to blow him quite yet about this kind of issue. But I'm not familiar enough to fully comment. I'm sure lemmings will line up to tell me why I'm wrong about this..

[-] ericbomb@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

I’m sure lemmings will line up to tell me why I’m wrong about this…

Is this a bad thing? If you're wrong, it's good to be corrected.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] takeda@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

First I thought it was onion, but now as I think of it, it is quite smart move. It will be very hard for the companies reject these demands, and hopefully will cause the strike to end soon.

[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 21 points 9 months ago

No other politician has learned and evolved like President Joe Biden (Dark Brandon FTW) has. He's cool AF

[-] VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social 25 points 9 months ago

He didn't do well with the rail strikers but I guess he's trying to redeem himself. But I prefer that over a President who's consistently against labor, like any Republican one would be.

[-] aski3252@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

I guess he's trying to redeem himself

I mean that's one way to put it, but at the end of the day, he isn't some manga anti-hero, he is a politician and politicians want to be elected.

I am pretty sure this is about the UAW's change of attitude that puts immense pressure on Biden, especially that they are withholding their endorsment for Biden until he "earned it". And of course Trump is also trying to suck up to the unions, so Biden has to step up his game.

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/09/17/uaw-auto-strike-joe-biden-union/70884657007/

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 21 points 9 months ago

Unless I misunderstand this, it’s also true that it is now against the law for a railroad worker to strike, and it will stay that way until/unless repealed. Unless something changes, that’s the last raise they can realistically ever get now that they are banned from using their only real lever of power.

Happily, this is a misunderstanding. The block on striking was short and temporary, essentially until the agreement was either accepted or rejected as a whole. The Railway Labor Act is still in effect, but it's been in effect for almost a century now, so that's nothing that's new or changed.

If the unions wanted to take up arms and get people riled up again, there's nothing stopping them from threatening another strike, except for the motivation (and material conditions) of their own members.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sickpusy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 9 months ago

Elections are around the corner.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
927 points (97.6% liked)

politics

18129 readers
3591 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS